COMPLIANCE INFO_2004-2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A& 0 MF San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, California 95205-6232 Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-3433 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd Underground Storage Tank Program Inspection Report Facility Name: Facility Address: Date: STOCKTON AUTO CENTER CAR WASH 3434 E Hammer Ln, Stockton November 12, 2014 SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS (CLASS 1,CLASS 11,or MINOR-Notice to Comply) Item# Remarks 107 CCR 2632(d)(1)(C) Plot plan/site map not submitted or failed to completely show where monitoring is performed. A UST Monitoring Site Plan was not submitted. A site plan must be submitted identifying the locations where monitoring will be performed. A copy of the UST Monitoring Site Plan was uploaded into CERS during time of inspection. This is a minor violation. 306 CCR 2630(d) Monitoring equipment is not installed or maintained to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. The 87, 91, and diesel STP turbine sump sensors were not at the lowest point of the sumps and not located to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. Monitoring equipment shall be maintained to be able to detect a leak at the earliest possible opportunity. The sensors were relocated to the lowest point of the sumps by the service technician. Ensure that all monitoring equipment is maintained to detect a leak at the earliest opportunity. This is a Class II violation. 319 HSC 25291(e)Water in secondary containment not removed, analyzed, and properly disposed of(pre-Jul 2003). Liquid was observed on the south side of the 87 fill sump and on the south side of the diesel STP sump . If water could enter into the secondary containment by precipitation or infiltration, it must be removed and disposed of properly. The service technician removed two cups of water from the 87 fill sump and one cup of water from the diesel STP sump and retained it for future use. Ensure that the 87 fill sump and diesel STP sump are maintained free of liquid. This is a Class II violation. 326 CCR 2635(b)(2)Overfill prevention system not present,was overridden, or failed to meet overfill requirements. The Enunciator, used as part of the overfill prevention system did not function on the diesel UST overfill prevention system was tested. The service technician adjusted the enunciator knob for volume and retested all the overfill prevention systems for all the UST tanks with passing results. This is a Class II violation. NOTE: If in the future the overfill prevention system in not functioning, immediately discontinue deposition of petroleum into the tanks until the component is repaired or replaced by a properly licensed,trained, and certified contractor under permit and inspection of the EHD. If the failed component can't be replaced immediately, there is a possibility that the UST system may be red tagged to prevent fuel inputs. Overall Inspection Comments: Consent to perform the inspection, take photos and collect samples was given by Harold Murray the Manager . This facility's designated operator is Dave Winkler (ICC expiration date: 3/10/16) . The service technician was Dave Winkler (ICC expiration date: 3/3/16), who had the following manufacturer's certifications: VR, 2/10/16, VMI, 11/10/15. Please be aware that as of January 1, 2014, facility operators are required to upload the following UST program documents into the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS): UST Monitoring Site Plan, UST Certification of Financial Responsibility, UST Response Plan, UST Owner/Operator: Written Agreement (if applicable), UST Letter from Chief Financial Officer, and Owner Statement of Designated UST Operator Compliance. Received,by(initial): Inspector: Pone: ta: ��J J� ELENA MANZO, REHS (209) 953-7699 11/12/2014 Page 4 of 5