My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992-2000
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1103
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232587
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2020 10:20:59 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:58:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1992-2000
RECORD_ID
PR0232587
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0004521
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA #201761*
STREET_NUMBER
1103
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
21935038
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1103 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232587_1103 S MAIN_1992-2000.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. A mechanical line leak detector <br />( ) was <br />( ) was not NA <br />i present in the majority of the pipeline systems used in the evaluation. <br />12. Please specify how much time elapsed between the delivery of product and the start of the <br />data collection: <br />( )oto6h NA <br />( )6to 12h <br />( ) 12 to 24h <br />( ) 24 h or more <br />Temperature Conditions <br />This system was evaluated under the range of temperature conditions specified in Table 1. <br />The difference between the temperature of the product circulated through the pipeline for 1 h or <br />more and the average temperature of the backfill and soil between 2 and 12 in. from the pipeline <br />is summarized in Table 1. If Option 1, 2 or 5 was used a more detailed summary of the product <br />temperature conditions generated for the evaluation is presented in Attachment 4. If Option 3 or <br />4 was used, no artificial temperature conditions were generated. <br />Table 1. Summary ofTemoerature Conditions Used in the Evaluation <br />Minimum Number of <br />Conditions Required <br />1 <br />Number of Conditions Used' <br />2 <br />Range of AT ('F)` <br />AT < -25 <br />4 <br />8 <br />-255OT<-15 <br />5 <br />11 <br />-15<®T<-5 <br />5 <br />8 <br />-5:5 AT < +5 <br />5 <br />14 <br />+5 < ST < +15 <br />4 <br />8 <br />+15 < AT < +25 <br />1 <br />12 1AT <br />> 25 <br />"Ibis column should be filled out only if Option 1, 2, or 5 was used. <br />®T is the difference between the temperature of the product dispensed through the pipeline for over an hour prior <br />to the conduct of a test and the average temperature of the backfill and soil surrounding the pipe. <br />Data Used to Make Performance Estimates <br />13. The induced leak rate and the test results used to estimate the performance of this system are <br />summarized in Attachment 5. Were any test runs removed from the data set? <br />(x) no <br />( ) yes <br />If yes, please specify the reason and include with Attachment 5. (If more than one test was <br />removed, specify each reason separately.) <br />Pipeline Leak Detection System - Results Form <br />n <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.