My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
437
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506406
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2023 3:32:05 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:58:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2009-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0506406
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002313
FACILITY_NAME
WILSON WAY CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
437
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15113052
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
437 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0506406_437 N WILSON_2009-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br /> { <br /> r <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.01 a <br /> e <br /> Complete the following checklist: <. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) <br /> ® N/A operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors,probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.