My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2009
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRANK WEST
>
120
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0515365
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2021 1:42:31 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:59:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006-2009
RECORD_ID
PR0515365
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0012107
FACILITY_NAME
A TEICHERT & SON INC*
STREET_NUMBER
120
STREET_NAME
FRANK WEST
STREET_TYPE
CIR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
19342006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
120 FRANK WEST CIR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FRANK WEST\120\PR0515365\SUMP REPAIR 2008.PDF
QuestysFileName
SUMP REPAIR 2008
QuestysRecordDate
11/10/2015 5:47:54 PM
QuestysRecordID
2922518
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11/05/2009 THU 8: 48 FAX 9163861256 A Teichert & Son Inc 2002/004 <br /> 410/28/2009 14:28 66139 .3 CHUCK HILL PAGE 02/04 <br /> Monitoring System Certification � <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Coen tete the feliowin checklist: <br /> M Yes ® Noy` is the audible alarm o erational? <br /> E7 Ycs ❑ No* is the visual alarm o erational7 <br /> t�Y� Na* Were all sensors visuall ins cted,fuuctionall tested and confirmed operational? <br /> W Yes Cl No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their ro r o ration? <br /> ❑ Yes CI No If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all cominunications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> C1i1 N/A operational? <br /> ®Yes -5-N * For pressurized piping systems,docs the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ NIA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,oris electrically disconnected? if yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) C]Sutnp/Trench Sensors;IM Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm ositive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? C]Yes- Cl No. <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> ❑ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill oin s and o Gratin ro erl ? if so,at what percent of tank c aci does the alarm tri mer? 94% <br /> Q Yes* -r-No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identity specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement Darts in Section.B,below. <br /> 1Xes* G No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as d `s stems? Check all that apply) <br /> 13Produ ®Water. If ,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes Q No* Was rnonitorin s stem set-up reviewed to ensure-proper settings?Attach set.up reports if a lieable <br /> 0 Yes ® No* is all monitorin a ui mento erationai per nnanufacturer's specifications? <br /> In Section lEr below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> C. Comments: se I su ha water 1 Wa r was- ye hewe_. <br /> trN_Q3r,_214 Page 2 of 4 Rev.06/04/81 <br /> www.aoidoes.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.