Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Iwater is associated with the bacterial cells and the culture is very viscous The nutrients in <br /> . the media at this time have been exhausted and the bacteria are still in the log phase of <br /> growth This cream is composed of bacteria reaching population of 101° (or more) per <br /> milliliter of water <br /> The microbial ("spent") broth was applied using a battery-operated hand sprayer After <br /> application, water was again applied, and the cell re-covered with plastic sheeting Purge <br /> water from monitoring wells on-site, stored in drums, was later added to the treatment cell <br /> to increase moisture content and aid bioremediation <br /> 3.3 Monitoring Activities <br />' Three soil samples were collected from the treatment cell on October 4, 1993, to monitor <br /> the progress of the treatment cell An additional set of three samples was collected on <br />' October 21, 1993 The samples were collected from the north, central and south areas of <br /> the treatment cell at depths of 15 to 2 feet using a metric soil sampler loaded with two <br /> clean, 2 by 3-inch brass tubes The ends of the lead tubes were covered with aluminum <br /> Isheets, capped and sealed with tape The samples were logged on a chain-of-custody, <br /> transported in a chilled container to McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) and analyzed for <br /> rPH as gasoline and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods 8015 and 8020, respectively <br /> ' 4.0 FINDINGS <br /> No TPH or BTE&X were detected In soil samples collected from the treatment cell The <br /> laboratory report and chain-of-custody for the soil samples are included in Appendix A <br /> On November 2, 1993, and upon approval of the PHS/EHD, the treated soil was returned <br /> to the excavation and compacted using a loader <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 5.1 Soil Contamination <br /> i Approximately 125 to 150 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed from the former <br /> UST location The soil was stockpiled In a lined treatment cell and treated with 50 gallons <br /> of bacterial broth (or inoculum) Samples collected from the treatment cell 20 and 35 days <br /> i after inoculation indicate that the soil was successfully remediated by the hydrocarbon- <br /> consuming microbes The soil was returned to the excavation and compacted <br /> i5.2 Monitoring Wells <br /> Groundwater contamination was not confirmed in the three monitoring wells during the <br /> igroundwater investigation The data indicate that groundwater has not been impacted We <br /> 0-1.6-1A.d.1 I.— Inc L <br /> a-rrdy R.pwW 2 930.1 5 6 <br /> i <br />