Laserfiche WebLink
- <br /> '- - <br /> 71 <br /> � Idlewild'Market Workplan - <br /> 4 -_" April8, 1994- <br /> Y <br /> T - <br /> " 7 Page <br /> chemical. analyses of soil samples from .the immediatevicinity-: <br /> =v <br /> of,. T5` and. T6 <br /> v {Figure 2,: Appendix 'A, for tank locations) . <br /> v <br /> i <br /> _ <br /> Tanks Tl -through -T3 were removed from Pit 1- located at the <br /> south end, of the existing pump- island Tank TeTand..associated - <br /> piping: were removed _from P.it2 located near the north ,end of the _: <br /> pump .island. Soil-.'samples were collected-beneath the farmer; <br /> f locations of the tanks and -piping: Gasoline -contaminated -soil <br /> was detected'--in Pit 1; beneath�'.tanks T1 and T3.- '(T1 5.3 47/kg. i <br /> xylene and T3 - .2-10_mg/kg4TPH---G) . - - <br /> w. <br /> Following,the_ tank removal, Oil _Equipment Service�166nducted <br /> � 3' c <br /> an=over-excavation- of =-p etroleum: stained soil, in Pit 1. -(Figure: 2) ` <br /> a <br /> �.4 The sidewalls of Pit :l. were�extended` outward ,approximately -3 .feet <br /> =and the. .floor of the-excavation- was extended= to 17 feet .below <br /> ground:, surface. One soil sample was-.collected from each` sidewall <br /> M _ IE - <br /> A <br /> l <br /> and the bottom of the enaged`: excavation. Laboratory analyses y <br /> ff <br /> of the. soil sample collected 'from- the north ssidewall of <br /> Pit_ 1' <br /> approximately 10 feet -be-low--ground surface -indicated-.1,400''mg/kg <br /> _gasoline. Field observations of -the north sidewall indicate <br /> �- <br /> petroleum-contaminated soil- .is present -between 6Tand . 1 ,_feet y <br /> s V. <br /> T. <br /> below ground' surface _ -Additi:onal soil,. could- not=be removed from <br /> the north sidewall without -resultingnin damage to'the canopy:' <br /> foundation. <br /> - - .41:1r <br /> "COND_.OR <br /> _- <br />