My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545718
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 11:19:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545718
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005526
FACILITY_NAME
K2 LOGISTICS
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
Zip
95253
APN
05139001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chaney,Walton &McCall (LLC) <br /> f 2. CW&M reviewed the San Joaquin County form entitled Notification of Hazardous <br /> r Waste Discharge", and the SWRCB form entitled "UST Unauthorized Release <br /> (Leak)/Contamination Site Report ("UAR"). Items listed in the forms that either were <br /> misidentified or warrant reconsideration include: <br /> 2A: The " Chemicals" or "Substance Involved" on both forms listed "waste 2 <br /> oil" instead of gasoline as the stored product. The VFO facility has never <br /> used a UST for storing waste oil. <br /> 2B: Line C of the PHS/EHD form lists " 819199" as the "Date Notified" for the <br /> "unknown Discharge". This is a mistake because there is no evidence-of a.-1 <br /> discharge. The August 1999 date is when Mr. Allan Corradi of VFO <br /> called PHS/EHD to request a copy of correspondence that related to the <br /> final regulatory status of the Site, since he assumed that the tank had <br /> received regulatory closure. <br /> 2C: On the SWRCB UAR form, the " Date Discovered" is listed as January <br /> 22, 1993. It is unclear why this date is on this form, or what it pertains to <br /> since the UST at VFO was removed on November 12, 1991. <br /> Summary <br /> There is no evidence in the PHS/EHD files of a petroleum hydrocarbon release from the <br /> former UST at the VFO Site. I <br /> On the basis of your review of this letter, we respectfully request that your office revise } <br /> the published conclusions of the PHS/EHD regarding the closure status of the Site's <br /> former UST, which was removed on November 12, 1991. In addition, we request that the <br /> notification to the State Water Resources Control Board and the August 10, 1999 letter to <br /> Dole Fresh Fruit Company, Inc. be rescinded/retracted. <br /> DF100101.SJCPH.1et.101599 4 530.758.8128 v/f <br /> recgroup@earthlink.net <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.