My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
13889
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545719
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 11:22:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545719
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005335
FACILITY_NAME
CHARLES JACOBS
STREET_NUMBER
13889
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
13889 W HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
li <br /> ABLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATANK SITES <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND A <br /> ion: Terminous Market, 13889 W. Hwy. 12, Lodi, San Joaquin County(RB#390239) <br /> Site Name and Local <br /> A 2005 sensitive receptor survey stated four private water <br /> 1r1. Distanceto production well for municipal, domestic, supply wells are located within 2,000', including one <br /> located 100'east of the USTs it. Potato Slough and the <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site Mokelumne River are 2,500'west, and an irrigation ditch <br /> is 40'to the south of the Site. <br /> II Y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of In April 1988, two 550-gallon gasoline USTs were <br /> any fo mer and existing tank systems, excavation contours and removed. . <br /> sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation <br /> contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings,. <br /> streets, and subsurface utilities; Site lithology consists of peat, clay,silt, and sand to 60', <br /> depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system the total depth investigated. <br /> 9 <br /> ' Y 3. Figures P _ <br /> diagrams; The fate of the excavated soil is not described in the <br /> Y 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); available reports. <br /> 5. Monitorin wells remainin on-site, fate; <br /> Six monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-8)will be properly abandoned. <br /> Depth to groundwater varied from 2'to 7'bgs. Groundwater flow <br /> _ _8.-Tabulated results.of_allgroundwater,...._._---, direction vaned f cn north-to south-Groundwater gradienCvaried from ` <br /> elevations and depths to water, 0.007 to 0.4 ft/ft. <br /> All data adequately tabulanzed in various reports, including closure repo <br /> 7. Tabulated results of all samplingrt. <br /> and analyses: <br /> FYIDetection limits for confirmation <br /> sampling <br /> QN Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and The contam'n t oftion the <br /> id entif ied <br /> applicable <br /> groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: reports. <br /> 0 Lateral and El Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of roundwater contamination _ <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface remediation An engineered remediation was not <br /> system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and groundwater remediation required by the lead agency. <br /> system; - <br /> YJ 10.-Reports/information FY Unauthorized Release Form ❑Y QMRs 17 from 11/04 to 10/08 <br /> ❑y Well and boring logs EY PAR 0 FRP M Other NFAR(10/09) <br /> Y 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not USTs removal and natural attenuation. <br /> usin BAT <br /> h 12. Reasons why background wasrs Minor residual soil contamination remains on-site. <br /> ttamable usin BAT; - <br /> 1' 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated The consultant estimates approximately 50 lbs of TPHg remains in soil. <br /> versus that remaining; <br /> 1, 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and The soil gas sample results were ND at levels comparable to Region 2 <br /> model used in risk assessments, and fate and ESLs. <br /> transport modelin ; <br /> y: 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site Soil contamination reportedly is limitedin extent.Land use <br /> will not adversely impact water quality, health, or (commercial)is not expected to change in the foreseeable future. <br /> other beneficial uses;and ' <br /> By: JLB Comments:In April 1988, two 550-gallon gasoline USTs were removed from the subject site. Based upon <br /> 17 quarters of groundwater monitoring showing a stable plume with declining concentrations to non-detect, <br /> Dater the limited extent of contamination remaining in soil, no foreseeable-changes in land use and no threats <br /> 11/24/2009 from soil vapor intrusion, Regional Board staff concur with San Joaquin County's Closure Recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.