Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Wright <br /> Environmental <br /> ` <br /> May 31, 1996 Services, Inc. j <br /> Project No. 4070-T <br /> M&M Automotive <br /> 60 East Tenth Street t <br /> Tracy, CA 95376 i <br /> Attn: Mr. Larry McLean <br /> i <br /> Re: Proposed Source Removal Cleanup and Monitoring Workplan, <br /> M &M Automotive, 60 E. 10th Street, Tracy, CA 95376 <br /> Dear Mr. McLean, , <br /> An underground gasoline storage tank was removed from the:M & M Automotive site <br /> in November, 1991 where contamination was observed in 'the tank .pit. Three <br /> groundwater monitoring wells exist on-site and some plume definition has been <br /> performed by Wright EnvironmentalServices, Inc. (Wright) in a. preliminary <br /> environmental assessment report dated March 10, 1995. Since some soil <br /> contamination was found to remain in the area of the .tank pit, dispenser island <br /> (collectively the source), and had been mapped into 10th Street, additional subsurface <br /> investigation to define the horizontal and vertical extent of soil and groundwater <br /> contamination was required by San Joaquin County Public Health Services, <br /> Environmental Health Division (PHS-EHD). Wright completed the soil and <br /> groundwater plume definition which was presented in the Problem Assessment <br /> Report (PAR) dated April 29, 1996. <br /> Based upon analysis of data gathered during the preliminary environmental <br /> assessment and the subsequent assessment work in March 1996 and April 1996 <br /> respectively, Wright has found the migration of contaminants on the capillary <br /> fringe away from the source has caused the groundwater problem, typical of sites <br /> with petroleum fuel contaminants. Seasonal groundwater fluctuations and <br /> infiltration from storm events may cause some additional spreading of contaminates, <br /> however, over time the plume has migrated only -a short distance under 10th Street, <br /> just north of the site. <br /> Introduction and Technical Approach <br /> Discussions with the PHS-EHD representative indicates concurrence with Wright that <br /> the groundwater plume has been defined by the work presented in the PAR, and <br /> plume movement is limited in extent. In addition a limited vadose soil cleanup of the <br /> former tank excavation and pump island area (the source) is warranted at this time. <br /> This would remove contaminants in the vicinity of the former tank and pump island <br /> which appear to be a continuing source of groundwater contamination. This is a <br /> consistent. approach with the current and evolving guidance prepared by the <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (RWQCB) and <br /> the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Wright understands that the <br /> RWQCB and SWRCB guidance and policy issues currently under review may be <br /> modified in the future however, site definition source removal and monitoring of <br /> wells around the groundwater plume appear to be the limits to which these <br /> modifications will go. ' <br /> 4220 Commercial Dr.#5 • Tracy, California 95376 <br /> Telephone (209) 833-0758 • Fax (209) 832-5152 <br />