Laserfiche WebLink
LA <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> �+ On June 30, 2008, to comply with quarterly groundwater monitoring requirements, Ramage <br /> Environmental monitored and sampled the three wells. <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> To calculate the groundwater gradient and flow direction, Ramage Environmental measured <br /> depth-to-groundwater in all three wells using a water level indicator. The depth-to-groundwater <br /> beneath the site ranged from 8.67 feet bgs in MW-3 to 9.14 feet bgs in MW-1. The groundwater <br /> elevation beneath the site ranged from a high of 40.24 feet above mean sea level (msl) in MW-1 <br /> to a low of 40.10 feet above msl in MW-3. The resulting groundwater surface appears as a <br /> regular plane dipping toward the north-northwest at a gradient of approximately 0.0022 foot/foot. <br /> A groundwater surface contour map is included as Figure 3, and the groundwater monitoring <br /> data are summarized in Table 2. <br /> Between March 21, and June 30, 2008, the groundwater elevation in the three monitoring wells <br /> dropped an average of 0.38 feet, the gradient decreased from 0.0029 to 0.0022 foot/foot, and <br /> the groundwater flow direction remained toward the north. These groundwater surface <br /> characteristics are consistent with historical and seasonal trends. <br /> r ; <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis <br /> Following groundwater level measurements, Ramage Environmental purged and sampled all <br /> three monitoring wells. The wells were purged using a pump and dedicated disposable tubing, <br /> until at least three well casing volumes were extracted and/or after groundwater temperature,'pH <br /> and electrical conductivity values had stabilized. The sampling information field sheets are <br /> I— 1cluded in Appendix A. <br /> i 51lowing well purging and recharge, Ramage Environmental sampled groundwater from the <br /> ►IIs using dedicated disposable bailers and laboratory-supplied containers. The groundwater <br /> • ; apples were transported in an iced cooler with chain-of-custody documentation to Excelchem <br /> iironmental Labs (Excelchem), a state of California certified hazardous waste testing <br /> �._ $ratory (Certification #2119). Excelchem analyzed each of the groundwater samples for <br /> iT i-as-diesel by EPA Method 8015M, TPH-as-gasoline, and BTEX by EPA Method <br /> 1B/8015M, and for methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary butyl <br /> ?tl '(ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2- <br /> and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) by EPA Method 82606. <br /> 6 <br />