My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010736
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
9110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545727
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010736
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2020 11:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/4/2020 11:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010736
RECORD_ID
PR0545727
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005693
FACILITY_NAME
7-ELEVEN INC. STORE #20680
STREET_NUMBER
9110
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95209
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9110 Thornton Rd
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9110 Thornton Road, Stockton, California September 2, 1994 <br /> .i The Southland Corporation Page 2 <br /> Soil Contamination <br /> From February 1987 through January 1991, a sod vapor extraction system was In operation at the <br /> site During operation, a 100-cubie4eet-per-minute (cfm) blower was in use On January 13, 1994, a <br /> vapor extraction test was conducted using a 1 5-horsepower (hp) blower During the test the <br /> maximum measured flow rate was 83 cfm The test blower produced Induced vacuum of 0 1 inch of <br /> water column at 100 feet from the test well The linear regression graph on Figure 10 of the <br /> Addendum to Closure Report indicates that there was pressure (vacuum) gradient to at least 100 <br /> feet from the vapor extraction well The slope of the line on the graph represents pressure gradient <br /> which induces vapor flow The calculated radius of capture of 100 feet given in the report is a <br /> conservative estimate based on data collected during a short term test and based on laws of <br /> physics <br /> Sod samples collected from confirmation sod borings drilled on January 12, 1993, did not contain <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons at concentrations above detection limits Analysis of vapors collected <br /> during the January 1994 soil vapor extraction test did not contain benzene The maximum <br /> concentration of TPH-G detected in the sod vapors was 74 micrograms per liter and the <br /> hysirocarbon extraction rate during_ a k�nef tey st was a pproximately_U5 lbs q4y Typically, <br /> however, hydrocarbon concentrations drop rapidly with time when vapor extraction is initiated after a <br /> prolonged time of no vapor extraction, and the concentrations reach low asymptotic levels within a <br /> few hours or a few days The data indicate that low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons exist <br /> locally in the vadoze zone, but the results of sod analyses indicate that detectable levels of adsorbed <br /> hydrocarbons are not present In the sod <br /> Summary <br /> Sod vapor extraction was used to remediate the site from February 1987 through January 1991 The <br /> remediation system was turned off because hydrocarbon concentrations from the sod vapor <br /> extraction system had reached low asymptotic levels It is the opinion of Southland that the <br /> concentrations of remaining petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil are not sufficient to impact the <br /> groundwater Furthermore, groundwater sampling indicates that while low concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons are present in groundwater, the random minor occurrences in one well do <br /> not constitute a measurable plume, do not demonstrate migration, and are not a threat to public <br /> health now and will not be a threat to public health in the future The Southland Corporation does <br /> not concur with the San Joaquin County's opinion as stated in the July 12, 1994 letter and wishes to <br /> appeal this matter to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB-CVR) A <br /> copy of this letter will be submitted to the CRWQCB-CVR as a basis for beginning a formal technical <br /> appeal to that agency <br /> ❑❑� GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑❑❑ TECHNOLOGY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.