Laserfiche WebLink
• Closure Report 3 <br /> The Southland Corporation,9110 Thomton Road, Stockton,CA December 5, 1995 <br /> ■ Depth to groundwater at the site has fluctuated historically from approximately 30 to 50 <br /> feet BGS Historical and current groundwater flow at the site is towards the east or <br /> southeast Potenbometric surface maps for February 23, 1987,July 26, 1988, June 1, <br /> 1990,April 2, 1993, and September 6, 1995 are provided as Figures 4 through 8 <br /> Fluctuations in groundwater elevation are illustrated on Figure 9 <br /> ■ In January and February 1993, nine confirmation soil borings (A-G, I,J) were <br /> advanced to depths of 45 feet below ground surface (BGS) In August 1995, seven <br /> additional soil confirmation borings (K- Q)were advanced Results of soil confirmation <br /> bonngs are discussed in Section 4 2 of this report Boring logs are provided in <br /> Attachment 4 <br /> 12 Remediation Pilot Tests <br /> 1.21 Groundwater Extraction <br /> In March 1988, a 24-hour aquifer pumping test was performed to acquire data with which aquifer <br /> parameters were estimated for the groundwater remediation wells A constant rate pump test at an <br /> extraction rate of 5 gpm from RW-1 resulted in a calculated Transmissivity (T)value of 5200 gpd/ft <br /> Capture distances were calculated using the following expressions <br />• r= (229'0)1(T'I) <br /> r,= r'1 6 <br /> with r= Downgradient distance to stagnation point(ft) <br /> rc= Crossgradient distance to stagnation point(ft) <br /> Q = Extraction Rate (gpm) <br /> T= Transmissivity (gpmtft) <br /> I = Stabc groundwater gradient <br /> Using an extraction rate of 5 gpm, a T of 5200 gpd/ft, and a gradient of 0 002,downgradient and <br /> crossgradient groundwater capture distances of 110 and 180 feet were calculated The calculated <br /> capture zone at 5 gpm is illustrated on Figure 10 <br /> 122 Soil Vapor Extraction <br /> On January 13, 1994, a soil vapor extraction (SVE) test was conducted to determine if hydrocarbons <br /> were present in subsurface soils,to estimate radius of capture of vapor extraction, and to estimate <br /> potential hydrocarbon mass extraction rates Tests were conducted on mondonng wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-5, MW-8, MW-10, MW-12, primping wells PW-2 and PW-3, and vadose wells VP-1,VP-2 and <br /> VP-3 (Figure 2) <br /> cb,,,,e2 rvasn+L-45 5) <br /> OFIC GROUNI)ll-XI l,lt <br /> TI;CHNOLOG) <br />