Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Appeal Statement No. 2: <br /> This subdivision will reduce the potential impacts associated with horses. Horse raising is permitted as <br /> an accessory use in the R-R zone. For less than five acres, one horse is permitted for the first acre, and <br /> one additional horse is permitted for each 10,000 square feet over one acre. Before subdivision, 16 <br /> horses may be permitted on this property. If the property is subdivided as proposed, six horses may be <br /> permitted on each parcel for a total of 12 horses. <br /> Cattle and other ruminants (except horses), sheep, goats, and similar livestock (except swine) may be <br /> permitted under the 'Family Food Production' and 'Educational Animal Project' use types. These uses <br /> are limited to five animals per parcel. This approval could lead to permitting a larger number of animals <br /> other than horses. However, there would be a corresponding decrease in the number of horses <br /> permitted. Therefore, the net effect of this subdivision will be to reduce the total number of animals <br /> permitted on this property. <br /> Appeal Statement No. 3: <br /> The creation of a flag lot creates an undesirable precedent for development in the area. The <br /> design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is thus inconsistent with the land use goals <br /> and objectives of the General Plan. The project should be redesigned. <br /> Response to Appeal Statement No. 3: <br /> The flag lot configuration does not set a precedent. It is consistent with the Schack circulation plan and <br /> all County standards and requirements. <br /> Appeal Statement No. 4: <br /> Additional mitigation measures should have been imposed on the project to mitigate the impacts <br /> on adjoining properties as set forth in 1 -3, above. In the alternative, further environmental review <br /> should be performed. <br /> Response to Appeal Statement No. 4: <br /> Until the property owners in this vicinity agree on a plan for development, each subdivision will reduce <br /> the circulation possibilities for subsequent subdivisions. Also, as noted earlier, this subdivision will not <br /> have an adverse impact relative to farm animals. <br /> San Joaquin County MS-96-9/Minata Family Trust <br /> Community Development Page 6 <br />