Laserfiche WebLink
Pesticide Rinse Water Disposal Sites -2- <br /> In May 1985, staff completed a survey of 160 sites which handled pesticides <br /> and/or fertilizers. Review and ranking of these sites was completed in April <br /> 1986, and 130 sites identified where pesticide rinse water disposal practices <br /> needed to be evaluated. Due to a lack of technical information on rinse water <br /> disposal sites, it was decided to collect samples from selected disposal areas, <br /> primarily those representative of sites considered to have the greatest poten- <br /> tial to affect water quality (the MAD sites were not selected on this basis). At <br /> some sites, water from on-site or adjacent wells was sampled when regional <br /> hydrogeology, well construction parameters , and waste disposal practices <br /> indicated a potential for impact on ground water. <br /> SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSES <br /> As indicated above, most pesticides used in the study area fall into six <br /> chemical classes . All classes may not be used by an applicator. Mosquito <br /> abatement districts in particular usually utilize only •one class of pesticides <br /> (OPs) . None of the sites studied had any historical discharge of soil fumigants <br /> such as DBCP or EDB, and hence analyses for volatile organics were not con- <br /> ducted. Laboratory test procedures are available for each class and can be run <br /> on soil or water samples. Generally, eight ounces of soil or two liters of water <br /> are sufficient sample for analyses covering all six classes of pesticides. <br /> Appendix B describes the collection procedures used and lists the pesticides <br /> that could be detected in each class. Note that some pesticides in current use <br /> are not included in the lists. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Forty-four samples were collected at thirteen . facilities during this inves- <br /> tigation. The individual facilities and sampling results are discussed in <br /> Appendix C; analytical data is presented in Appendix D. A summary of the <br /> findings is presented below. <br /> The results obtained during this investigation are generally consistent with <br /> current scientific thought on the behavior of pesticides in the environment. In <br /> particular, three basic observations can be made: <br /> 1. At facilities with histories that included the use of persistent OC <br /> pesticides , detectable levels of OC pesticide and breakdown products <br /> remained at rinse water disposal sites. In particular, DDT and its <br /> metabolites were encountered at most sites that were in use prior to 1973. <br /> The finding of DDT is consistent with findings of DDT in agricultural <br /> fields that had been treated with DDT and in drains that receive runoff <br /> from such fields.1,2 <br /> 1. "Agricultural Sources of DDT Residues in California' s Environment" , <br /> California Department of Food and Agriculture, September, 1985. <br /> 2. DDT in the Salinas Valley" , California State Water Resources Control <br /> Board, Report No. 86-2-WQ. <br /> Lam' <br />