Laserfiche WebLink
' 24 May 2001 <br /> • <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0254 <br /> IPage 3 of 4 <br /> I MW-6 Ground water elevations at the site increased an average 0 08 feet between the January 2001 <br /> and April 2001 sampling events <br /> The ground water flow direction for the 25 April 2001 sampling event was inferred to be flowing <br /> towards the north at an average hydraulic gradient of 006 feet/feet Data from MW-1A, MW-2A <br /> and MW-7 was not used to determine ground water gradient These wells are screened at a deeper <br /> interval than the remaining wells Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> I TPH-g was detected in samples collected from wells MWAB and MW-4 at concentrations of 1,300 <br /> micrograms per liter (µg/1) and 120 4g11, respectively TPH-d was detected in the water samples <br /> collected from wells MW-113 and MW-7 at concentrations of 84 µg/1 and 130 µg/l, respectively <br />' TPH-g and TPH-d were not detected in the remaining samples <br /> One or more BTEX compounds were detected in the ground water samples collected from <br /> monitoring wells MW-1B, MW-4 and MW-7 at concentrations as high as 400µg/1 benzene, 27,ug/1 <br /> toluene, 43 µg/l ethylbenzene and 22 µg/1 xylenes <br /> I MTBE was detected in samples collected from MW-1B and MW-4 at concentrations of 12µg/1 and <br /> 1 5µg/l, respectively No other fuel oxygenates were detected in the ground water samples analyzed <br /> The analytical results are summarized in Table 2 Copies of the laboratory reports (MAI Laboratory <br /> ID 66187 to 66195), QA/QC reports and chain-of-custody forms are in Appendix B <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> IBased on the data collected during this monitoring period, AGE concludes <br /> • The depth to ground water at the site was between 6 87 to 8 61 feet below the well casing <br /> tops The average ground water elevation was 0 08 feet higher than the average ground water <br /> elevation last quarter The prevailing ground water flow direction at the site is generally <br /> northward which is consistent with the previously determined flow directions <br /> • Petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted ground water was encountered in samples from monitoring <br /> wells MW-1B, MW-4, and MW-7 with benzene concentrations exceeding the State of <br /> ICalifornia maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1 ppb in samples collected from MW-1 B <br /> • and MW-4 Low concentrations of MTBE were detected in the ground water samples <br /> collected from MW-1B and MW-4 MTBE concentrations did not exceed the State of <br /> California primary maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 13 ppb In general, overall <br /> Advanced GcoEnvlronmental Inc <br />