Laserfiche WebLink
I18 July 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0254 <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br /> 6 1 1 Ground Water Treatment Methods <br /> The documented presence of dissolved hydrocarbons will require treatment for the recovered water <br /> Two of the most common methods of water treatment are air stripping and carbon adsorption Air <br /> stripping involves removal of volatile organic compounds from ground water by promoting the <br /> transfer of contaminants from the dissolved phase to the vapor phase The process usually works well <br /> with volatile organic compounds, but less successfully with longer-chained hydrocarbons, such as <br />' commonly occur in diesel fuel Carbon adsorption utilizes granular activated carbon to simply <br /> "filter" organic compounds out of ground water <br />' A third, but less common method of above-ground treatment of water is bioremediation <br /> Contaminated ground water is "treated" by adding hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or by <br />' augmenting natural hydrocarbon degradation activities with the introduction of nutrients <br /> 6 1 2 Feasibility Testing <br /> On 28 August 2000,a limited aquifer pump test was performed at the site The depth-to-groundwater <br />' was measured in wells MW2B, MW3 and MW4 using a Solinst water level meter A two-inch <br /> diameter Grundfos submersible pump was then lowered into well MW 1B Pressure transducers were <br /> then placed in wells MWIA,MWIB and MW7 and connected to a data logger to record drawdown <br />' data from the wells, the height of the water column in each well was measured by the datalogger in <br /> one-minute time intervals Purge water was placed in a 4,000-gallon"Baker" above-ground storage <br /> tank <br />' The pumping rate was calculated to be approximately 10 gallons per minute (gpm) during the <br /> 28 August 2000 test The pumping rate was determined by measuring the time required to fill a 5- <br /> gallon bucket from the pumping discharge hose A maximum drawdown of approximately 2 89 feet <br /> was observed in MW-113 after 330 minutes of pumping A maximum drawdown of approximately <br />' 0 15 feet was observed in MW-1A after 264 minutes of pumping <br /> Wells MW-lA andMW-IB were the only wells during the extraction test that were observed to have <br />' measurable drawdown Using the Jacob Straight-Line Time-Drawdown Method, the drawdown <br /> versus time for wells MW-lA and MW-1B was graphed on semi-logarithmic paper, from which the <br /> transmissivity and storativity were subsequently calculated The transmissivities for wells MW-1A <br />' and MW-1B were calculated to be 293 gal/day-ft and 6,769 gal/day-ft,respectively The storativity <br /> for MW-1A was calculated to be 0 78 (unitless) <br />' A radius of influence could not be determined for this pump test due to the lack of drawdown <br /> observed in the surrounding wells Approximately 550 gallons of water were removed from MW 1B <br /> during the eight-hour test Field data is included in Appendix C <br /> 1 Advanced GevEnvirvnmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />