Laserfiche WebLink
'rabic 3. GeoProbe Groundwater Sample Chemical Analysis Results, <br /> ,Sampled October 29,30 and December-2,200 <br /> Sample ' 1' HD TP�iG Ser€ Tel �'€y! X - TBA i�4T�G i31PE E"C6=3� TAME 2, FOB �ii� PAe4t€ <br /> Number t DCA <br /> U l !3 l <br /> U!311 UW Up/i/i Ur 4 U A U Ii D0I if n u n u R vA u ri U94 <br /> B-7 2800 - -- ND ND< 0.57 N�?< _ND< Nt3< NO< ND< ND< ND<�NO< _ND< ND< NO- <br /> <50 0-5 0-5 0.5 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.50 <br /> 13-8 74W NO ND< ND< ND< ND< € ND< ND< HID< ND< NDe ND< IND< <br /> <50 0.5 0.5 0.5 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 f�0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.50 <br /> 8 4300 ND ND< 0.64 ND< NO< ND<' ND< ND< NO-e [-< K-b* ND- ND< NDI <br /> <50 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,50 <br /> B-10@ 310,000 740 ND< NO< ND< ND< , ND< € ND< NM< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< <br /> 20-25' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.50 <br /> 8-10@ ND ND ND< 10.74 ND< ND< ND< NO< ND< NO< ND< ND< NO< ND< ND< <br /> 30-34' <50 <50 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 (1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.50 T <br /> B-11 270,000 1000 ND-<-F()-X6 ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< ! ND< ND< ND< ND< NU< <br /> 0.5 l 0,5 0.5 i 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0-5 € 0.5 0.5 5 50 <br /> S 12Cm 1,10tf,4J0 1709 ND< ND< NO< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< NO< NlA< ND< ND< <br /> 20' 0.5 € 0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.50.5 0.5_ 0.5 015 0.5 Q.5 0150 <br /> B-12 120 NO NI)< 0-71 NO< ND< ND< NO< ND< ND< �N�l< I N1}< NC,< ND-< ND< <br /> 'Hydra <50 0.5 0.5 0.5 tt 5 0,5 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 50 <br /> Punch <br /> State Novo Nope 5 150 330 175Er Novo 13 Noni Alvno Nave �C.5 None Notre None <br /> I <br /> �MCLs �__ <br /> M;CrOgrarns per titer, ND-i toile dc-t,cted. `- LaboraioTy reports that somie hydrocarbons lower boiling, some <br /> higher boiling than Diesel. See laboratory reports for complete results, MCLS- Maximum Contaminant Levels, State <br /> of California MCL data from 2008 update to A"Compilation of Water Quality Goa{s,"Aug. 2007. None--'No values <br /> listed. Sample B-12@20'was collected from an open screen about 20-24'deep. <br /> Table 4. Groundwater Monitoring Well Chemical Analyses Sampled Feb. l2,20909 <br /> Nmbar TPHD T€PHG Ben T'ol 1 h1 €.. }Cyl TBA z�"i -E-TB-E--I--'r-AME 1-2. ff6-9- Eth Meth <br /> DCA r <br /> U i Ugfl U tl U Lf `t Uri ' U _ i`gt! � � - U 11 l3eJl UgjI U011 <br /> MW 1 2C�Ots SG - YtiEC� 6.57 N[}< ND< ND< i+ID<'- PtD< ND< ND< s ND< ND< W 17 age € <br /> 0.5�� 4.5 0.5. 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 A.5 0.5 0.5 <br /> fvlV1'-2 160 ND ND< ND< ND< ND< NO< ND< ND< ND< NO< ND< ND< ND< 11 <br /> <50 0.5 , O.S O.i 4.5 0 5 0.$ 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <br /> PAW-3 1500 Nt3 ND< 0.64. NO< ND< ND< ND< NlD< NO, NO< ND< ND< 6,7 � 140 <br /> <56 0.5 0.5 0.5 i 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <br /> ML�114 550 N€? N < ND< ND< ND< ? ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< ND< NID< 64 [ 100 i <br /> <50 D.? _0.5 0.5 0.5_ 0.5 O.S 0.5 0_5 _ 0.5 fl.5 0.5 p <br /> Stee None Nona 5 150 :300 1750 € Nene 13 None Nape None 0.5 Alno� None I None <br /> MCC s <br /> Ug/l- Micrograms per liter. NO -- None detected, See laboratory reports for comp results. P CLs - Maximum <br /> Contaminant Levels,Stcte of California MCL data from 2005 updats 10 A"Cornpilation of Water Quality Coals,"Aug. <br /> 2007, Nene--No values listed. <br /> Page 12 of 14 <br />