Laserfiche WebLink
B'OND SERVICE CENTER - Page 2 of 2 <br /> Addltlonal Information <br /> Should this rase be closed in spite of NOT meeting poEicy criteria? <br /> Explain: - <br /> site is in closure process. Free product was described as a sheen early in the site investigaxion, but was not noted in <br /> later menitoring events. Two soil samples beneath dispensers, unspecified depth, And on 10-foot—il sample contained TPH > �-, YES r NO <br /> 100 mg/kg, box voaltiles very low or ND, pass Table 1. GW has NO or very low volatiles, so'potential for VI appears to be <br /> quite low. Inactive muni well - 200 feet from site not impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons, but has other water quality <br /> issues. The CHRhRC 6 has <br /> concurred with site closure, monitoring wells have been destroyed and site closure is pending <br /> eceipt of IDw disposal documents. <br /> _ +F <br /> SPELL.CHECK <br /> Save in Progress Save as Final <br /> CONTACT GEOTRALKER HELP <br />.�.v <br /> LOGGED tN AS HENCERSONN <br /> T <br /> f ' <br /> https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/screens/closure_policy.asp?global_id=T06.,. 8/5/2013 <br />