Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kyle le Christie 22 February 1989 <br /> . . <br /> ARCO Products Company <br /> • 200 Alameda de las Pul gas <br /> P.O. Box 5811 . <br /> San Mateo, CA 94403 <br /> 3 WORK PLAN FOR PROBLEM ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION FOR ARCO STATION NO. 2093 AT <br /> 3425 TRACY BOULEVARD,, TRACY, SAN JAOQUIN COUNTY <br /> Thank you for submitting your 10 October 1988 work plan for this site for our <br /> review. This letter is a response to both the 10 October 1988 work plan and <br /> the incomplete 27 September 1987 PAR. <br /> -*WORK PLAN (10 October 1988) <br /> he work proposed in this work plan will not define the full extent of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon contamination related to this site. !A site assessment, <br /> and corresponding PAR, cannot be considered complete untilithe "effective zero <br /> line" has been established. I discussed this by telephonewith your <br /> consultant, Mr. Lawrence Phillips of Brown and Caldwell (BC) on 21 February <br /> 1989. Mr. Phillips stated that BC, in agreement with ARCO; plans a phased <br /> approach site investigation which consists of the on-site phase followed by <br /> the off-site phase. The current work plan is for the on-site phase of the <br /> investigation to supply soil and ground water data to assist in selecting the <br /> locations of the monitoring wells for the off-site phase of the investigation.. <br /> 7 Although we -believe this investigation has been protracted ° inordinately, we <br /> 2 agree to accept this phase approached investigation with the understanding <br /> �j that the results of the on-site phase, along with a work plan for the off-site <br /> phase are to be submitted to us- and the San Joaquin Local Health District <br /> (SJLHD) by 15 April 1989. We request that .water samples be collected. from all; <br /> the monitoring wells, and in' addition to BTX&E and TPH analyses, 1 ,2-dichloro <br /> ethane analyses be performed. <br /> In the off-site investigation the full extent of ground water contaminated by <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons is to be defined and integrated with the on-site work. <br /> The documentation is to be- submitted as a revised PAR to us and the SJLHD by <br /> 2 June 1989. The revised PAR is to expand -on the information presented in the <br /> 28 September 1987 PAR and include all other necessary information as specified <br /> in my summary below and Appendix A of the Tri-Regional Guidelines, pages A-9 <br /> through A-11 (Enclosed) . <br /> PROBLEM ASSESSMENT REPORT- (28 September 1987) <br /> The 28 September 1987 PAR cannot be considered complete because the extent of <br /> the hydrocarbon plume was not defined. In 'addition, we have the following <br /> comments about the submitted .PAR that are to be addressed in your revised PAR: <br /> 1 . All ground water wells within 2000 feet of this site ''are to be <br /> identified and shown on a well survey map. One municipal well was <br /> identified in the 28 September 1987 PAR, but no mention was made about <br /> private domestic or irrigation wells. If no private domestic or <br /> irrigation wells are located within 2000 feet of the site, so state; <br />