ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007566 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jason Magness To "Verne_Brown@URSCorp com" <Verne_Brown@URSCorp comp #j <MagnessJR@pplant cc UCDavis educe Subject Proposal 07/23/02 09 59 AM Verne, was hoping to get back to you sooner on the proposal, but Joe Stagner dust returned from a week long vacation yesterday I met with both Joe, and David Phillips to discuss both the technical details about the proposal as well as budgetary impacts Since the EMF pot of money is tight this year and Joe felt some of the tasks were not needed at this point, we need to get a revised proposal from URS Task 1 - OK as proposed Task 2 -delete for now If we see evidence of a larger plume to the north of well 16C, we may need to revisit the possibility of reinstating a scaled down version of this task Task 3 - revised costs for only one-4" monitoring well, and one-8" extraction well We would also like to get costs for the one extraction well at 10", and 12" diameters rather than 8" The larger the EW diameter, the more efficient the remediation, so we are going to do a quick estimate on return if we went up to a larger diameter well Task 4 - OK as proposed '• Task 5 - l may need to exercise this task later, but I am not going to authorize at this time Additional info (resumes) I would like provided is specifically who will perform the field work (logging soil, overseeing the well construction, aquifer testing, etc ) and who will do the Modeling and aquifer characterization data interpretation Also include a draft schedule I hope to begin the field work in a few months, so the work plan to UCD by the end of September if possible After I get a revised proposal from URS, I should be able to cut an authorization for you to begin Task 1 Jason