Laserfiche WebLink
1 - , <br /> . 20 July 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0657 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' 2 2 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from each purged well using new disposable plastic bailers after <br />' - allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80%recovery of the pre-purge water volume Each water <br /> sample was transferred into one 1-liter amber bottle without sample preservative and into three <br /> 40-m1 volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample <br />' preservative After collection, the samples were properly labeled, placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical laboratory,for analysis The samples were <br />' analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX)and the fuel additives di-isopropyl <br /> ether(RIPE),ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary- <br /> amyl methyl ether(TAME),tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA)and <br /> 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 12 January 2004 The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified from the laboratory <br /> analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At the time of the January 2004 sampling event, depths to ground water ranged from 35 03 (MW-7) <br /> feet to 37 08 (MW-6) feet below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevation at the site <br /> averaged approximately 5 36 feet above mean sea level (MSL) which indicates an increase in <br /> elevation of approximately 0 77 feet since the October 2003 monitoring event (Table 1) During this <br /> monitoring event, the ground water levels In the wells were at least four feet below the tops of the <br /> well screens, indicating that the wells are screened properly to yield representative shallow ground <br /> water samples <br /> Ground water flow was inferred to be flowing towards the southwest with an average hydraulic <br /> gradient of 0 003 foot/foot This flow direction remains consistent with the previous monitoring <br /> events Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 12 January 2004 <br /> Iand also includes a rose diagram showing ground water directions from previous monitoring events <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />