Laserfiche WebLink
r rst <br />' 25 February 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 99-0657 <br />' Page 3 of 4 <br />' One or more BTEX compounds were detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-5 with maximum concentrations of 250µg/1 benzene,670 µg/1 toluene,240µg/1 ethylbenzene <br /> and 918 µg/1 xylenes all from sample MW-1 <br />' MTBE was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-6 at <br /> concentrations ranging from 60 µg/1 (MW-4) to 540 µg/1 (MW-2) <br />' 1,2-DCA was detected in water samples collected from MW-4 and MW-6 at a maximum <br /> concentration of 20 µg/l (MW-4) <br />' No other analytes were detected at or above laboratory detection limits In the ground water samples <br /> analyzed The analytical results of water samples collected in October 2003 are summarized on <br />' Table 2 The laboratory report(CTEL Lab Project No CT214-0310046), QA/QC report and chain- <br /> of-custody form are included in Appendix C <br />' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> lie The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this investigation <br /> • The ground water elevation averaged approximately 4 59 feet above MSL Ground water is <br /> inferred to be flowing toward the southwest with an average ground water gradient of <br /> 0 004 foot/foot The ground water elevation at the site is the lowest level recorded to date, <br /> with a average decrease of 0 10 feet between the July 2003 and October 2003 monitoring <br /> events <br /> • The highest concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons occurred in monitoring wells MW-1, <br /> MW-4 and MW-6, which are located down-gradient of the UST area Concentration maps <br /> depicting the approximate distribution of dissolved TPH-g,benzene and MTBE are presented <br /> in Figures 4, 5 and 6 <br /> • Concentrations of dissolved TPH-g, BTEX and fuel additives have decreased significantly <br /> in MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 Concentrations of dissolved TPH-g, BTEX <br />' and fuel additives increased two-fold 1n MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3 This is the opposite trend <br /> that was seen In July 2003, the coincidence of these two trends may likely indicate an active <br /> migration ofthe dissolved phase hydrocarbon plume or the localized desorption of additional <br /> hydrocarbons at the former UST area <br /> • The lateral extent of ground water has been defined to the north, east and southeast of the <br /> I UST area The vertical extent ofpetroleum hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater has not been <br /> defined <br /> • The lateral extent of Impacted soil in the vadose zone has been defined <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />