Laserfiche WebLink
� �.,, - - a � c. .� ''! Y ,rc s •err «': <br /> s <br /> Soil Data <br /> Soil sampling depths and analytical results are summarized in Table 4. <br /> Laboratory analytical data sheets and chain-of-custody forms are presented <br /> in Appendix III, As shown in Table 4, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene <br /> were detected in soils from MW-1, SB-2, SB-4, and SB-5. No other VOAs <br /> 1 were detected in soil samples. Concentrations of toluene and xylenes in <br /> JbY soil were all considerably below designated levels to protect groundwater <br /> (100 ppm and 620 ppm, respectively) as established by the Central Valley <br /> n,Q Regional Water Quality Control Board in the October 1936 "Designated Level <br /> Methodology" staff report. Ethylbenzene, however, was detected in <br /> concentrations above the 29 ppm "designated level" in a single soil sample <br /> taken at a depth of 17 to 17.5 feet from SB-2. Concentrations of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline above 100 ppm were detected in soils <br /> from MW-1, SB-1, SB-2. It should be noted, however, that the laboratory <br /> detection limit used in the TPH-G analyses of the 40.5 to .0-foot so 1- <br /> san}ples~fam 23W-1 and MW-2 was set at 250 m. Analy��tAZ res-ticalfor <br /> _hese sam les were not available until after-sample holdin times hadb ea n' c <br /> exceeded and so the sam�es could not be resubmitted for analysis at a <br /> dower detection limit. --- `T�-- — - <br /> Soil samples from MW-7, -8, -9, and -10 were arr.iived pending results of <br /> groundwater sampling. Since no contaminants were detected in water <br /> samples taken from those wells, the soil samples were not submitted for <br /> laboratory analysis. <br /> Figures 8, 9, and 10 show the estimated lateral and vertical extent of <br /> chemical occurrence in soils and groundwater at the site. The extent of <br /> soil contamination has been depicted based on levels of TPH-G greater than <br /> 100 ppm. The extent of groundwater contamination has been depicted based <br /> \ on the presence of chemicals in concentrations above drinking water <br /> standards. <br /> As shown in Figure 8, soils containing elevated concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons extend from the former tank location at a depth of <br /> 7 feet below ground surface, a lateral distance of up to 35 feet, <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination extends vertically down to groundwater <br /> in the vicinity of the former tank site. <br /> Groundwater Data <br /> Results of groundwater analyses are presented in Table 5. Laboratory <br /> analytical data sheets and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix <br /> IV. As shown in Table 5, TPH-G, benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene, <br /> and dichloromethane were detected in groundwater samples. No other <br /> compounds were detected. Concentrations of benzene above State DHS <br /> Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water were detected in <br /> monitor wells MW-1, -3, and -6. All other VOCs which were detected in <br /> groundwater were reported in concentrations well below established <br /> drinking water standards, The lateral extent of groundwater contamination <br /> -_-__--_-_-----at--this-site,---as shown-in -Figure-8- terminates-a -maximum--of 100-feet <br /> downgradient of the former tank site. The vertical extent of groundwater <br /> 19 <br />