Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' 05 September 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0141 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />' 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br />' A water sample was collected from each well using a new, clean, disposable plastic bailer <br /> Immediately upon retrieval, the sample was transferred into three properly labeled 40-nil. EPA- <br /> approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The samples <br /> were logged on a chain-of-custody form, stored in a chilled container and transported under chain-of <br /> custody to Cal Tech Analytical Laboratories (CTEL), a California Department of Health Services <br />' (DHS)-certified laboratory The ground water samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8021, and <br /> • <br /> The oxygenated compounds df-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> MTBE, tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), 1,2-dibromoethane <br />'• (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B, <br /> respectively <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevations and flow directions were inferred from field data Hydrocarbon-impact to <br /> ground water was characterized from laboratory analytical data <br /> 31 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The average ground water elevation of the seven shallow ground water monitoring wells on <br /> 05 August 2002 was approximately 12 85 feet below mean sea level (ms]), with the average depth <br /> of water at 20 5 feet below casing tops The ground water table occurred within the screened <br /> intervals of wells MW-7 and MW-8 but was between 8 29 and 9 87 feet above the screened intervals <br /> in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 Monitoring well MW-6 was designed as a piezometer, <br /> with a 5-foot screened interval set at approximately 39 feet below the water table, since it possibly <br /> is monitoring a different hydraulic zone, MW-6 was not used to determine gradient and flow <br /> direction <br />' Based on data collected during the August 2002 monitoring event,the groundwater table underlying <br /> the site formed a south-southwest-trending nose plunging at a gradient of 0 002 ft/ft The western <br /> Ilimb of the trough flowed westerly, the eastern limb's flow direction was southeast <br /> Advanced GeoEnvfmnmentat,Inc <br />