My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007031
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNPIKE
>
1607
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545774
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:32:23 PM
Creation date
6/10/2020 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007031
RECORD_ID
PR0545774
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004998
FACILITY_NAME
COMFORT AIR
STREET_NUMBER
1607
STREET_NAME
TURNPIKE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1607 TURNPIKE RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 28 March 2002 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 95-0141 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> • TPH-g was detected in ground water samples collected from seven of the eight monitoring <br /> wells at the site (MW-1 through MW-4, MW-6 and MW-7) Concentrations as high as <br /> 150,000 gg/l were detected <br /> I0 BTEX constituents were detected in six of the eight ground water monitoring wells with <br /> concentrations as high as 8,600 µg/1 benzene, 25,000 µg/1 toluene, 3,200 µg/1 ethylbenzene <br /> and 15,000 µg/1 total xylenes in the water samples from MW-1 <br /> • TBA was detected In MW-5 and MW-6 at concentrations of 6 1 µg/1 and 9 4 µg/1, <br /> respectively MTBE was detected In MW-6 at a concentration of 1 1 µg/1 DIPE, ETBE and <br /> TAME were not detected in any of the ground water samples collected <br /> • 1,2-DCA was detected in ground water samples collected from the eight monitoring wells <br /> at the site at concentrations as high as 310 µg/1 (MW-1) EDB was not detected above <br />' laboratory reporting limits in the samples collected during the February 2002 monitoring <br /> event <br />' a The horizontal and vertical extent of contamination related to the former UST has not yet <br /> been defined in soil or ground water <br /> lie <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the results of this and previous investigations, AGE recommends <br /> I0 Continued quarterly monitoring of the ground water monitoring network <br /> • Preparation of a work plan addendum to define the vertical and horizontal extent of <br /> hydrocarbon impacted soil and ground water at the site <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br />' environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based mainly <br /> upon analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the hydrogeologic <br /> conditions at the site have been made from a limited number of available data.points(1 a monitoring <br /> wells and ground water samples)and subsurface conditions may vary away from these data points <br /> No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made as to the professional interpretations,opinions and <br /> recommendations contained in this report <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.