Laserfiche WebLink
' 24 August 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0141 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> A water sample was collected from each well using a new, clean, disposable plastic bailer <br />' Immediately upon retrieval,the samples were transferred into three 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials <br /> containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The samples were logged on a <br /> chain-of-custody form, stored in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to <br />' McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified <br /> laboratory The ground water samples were analyzed for <br />' & Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8015 Modified, <br />' 0 Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons - benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 8020, and <br />' 9 Oxygenated compounds - di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol <br /> (TBA), ethyldibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA <br />' Method 8260-Modified, respectively <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevations iiia fio%Tr ciueetions were uilened from.field data Hydrocaibon-.mpact to <br /> ground water was characterized from laboratory analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The average ground water elevation of the seven shallow ground water monitoring wells on <br /> 08 August 2001 was approximately 12 3 feet below mean sea level (msl),with the average depth of <br /> water at 20 0 feet below casing tops The ground water table occurred within the screened intervals <br /> of wells MW 7 and MW-8 During the August 2001 monitoring event, ground water was between <br /> 8 82 and 10 37 feet above the screened intervals in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 <br /> Therefore, the five ground water monitoring wells were "drowned", and may not have yielded <br /> I samples fully representative of ground water conditions near the top of the saturated zone where fuel <br /> hydrocarbons would be expected to have the greatest impact The ground water table occurred <br /> approximately 40 feet above the screened interval of the deep well MW-6 <br /> fBased on data collected during the August 2001 monitoring event,ground water appears to be ridged <br /> • near the former UST area(Figure 3) The gradient was inferred to be flowing toward the northwest <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvirunmentai,Inc <br /> I <br />