Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' 16 January 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0505 <br />' Page 7 of 9 <br />' 43 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> During the 07 October 1999 ground water monitoring event, the average ground water elevation of <br />' the five ground water monitoring wells was approximately 11 68 feet below mean sea level (ms]), <br /> with the average depth of ground water at 19 38 feet below casing grade During the October <br /> monitoring event, ground water was between 9 44 and 10 94 feet above the screened intervals in <br />' monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 Therefore, the five ground water monitoring wells were <br /> "drowned", and may not have yielded a sample fully representative of ground water conditions near <br /> the top of the saturated zone, where fuel hydrocarbons would be expected to have the greatest <br />' impact <br /> The average ground water elevation of the seven shallow ground water monitoring wells on 10 <br />' November 2000 was approximately 11 8 feet below msl, with the average depth ofwater at 19 5 feet <br /> below casing grade The ground water table occurred within the screened intervals of wells MW-7 <br /> and MW-8 During the November monitoring event, ground water was between 9 04 and 10 53 feet <br />' above the screened intervals in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-5 The ground water table <br /> occurred approximately 40 feet above the screened interval of the deep well MW-6 <br /> IBased on data collected during the November 2000 groundwater monitoring event,the gradient was <br /> calculated to be 0 003 ft/ft (Figure 3) at the site Ground water flow direction was generally toward <br /> I the east Due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water measurements or <br /> changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly modify ground water flow <br /> direction <br /> 4 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> I Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-8 were sampled on 10 October 2000 The analytical results <br /> of ground water samples are as follows <br /> I • Concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX were detected in ground water samples collected from <br /> each monitoring well sampled at the site (MW-1 through MW-8) TPH-g concentrations <br /> ranged from 95 micrograms per liter(µg/l) in MW-4 to 110,000 µg/1 in MW-1 Benzene was <br /> detected in the ground water sainples at concentrations ranging from 0 53 µg/1 (MW-8) to <br /> 9,400 µg/1 (MW-1) Toluene was detected at concentrations ranging from 3 2 gg/l (MW-8) <br /> to 25,000µg/1(MW-1) Ethylbenzene was detected at concentrations ranging from.0 59 µg/1 <br /> (MW-8) to 3,100 µg/1(MW-1) Total xylenes were detected at concentrations ranging from <br /> 3 6 µg/l (MW-1) to 14,000 gg/1(MW-8) <br /> • MTBE and other fuel oxygenates were not detected in the ground water samples collected <br /> Ifrom the site <br /> • 1,2-DCA was detected in groundwater samples collected from each well sampled at the site <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironniental Inc <br />