Laserfiche WebLink
� r T <br /> �AW W <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> wells at depths of approximately 30 feet below grade The purpose of these bonngs was to <br /> investigate and define the extent of hydrocarbon impaction in soil and groundwater. The <br /> bonng/well locations are plotted on Figure 2 <br /> Field activities performed at the site are summarized in separate Problem Assessment Reports <br /> submitted by RESNA on May 30, 1991 and May 20, 1992 <br /> QUARTERLY MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling of site wells was conducted on February 2, 1994 by <br /> RESNA personnel Water level measurements were collected from each site monitoring well <br /> (Table 1) prior to purging and sampling Groundwater elevations across the site have risen an <br /> average of 1 4 feet since the last monitoring event in November 1993 The groundwater <br /> gradient was calculated using the February 2, 1994 groundwater elevation data and is illustrated <br /> on Figure 2 The figure depicts a variant gradient between 0 01 to 0 025 ft/ft, or 53 to 132 feet <br /> per mile in a southeasterly direction <br /> In accordance with San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division <br /> (PHS/EHD) correspondence dated May 5, 1993, all monitoring wells were sampled this quarter <br /> Prior to groundwater sample collection, a minimum of 3 casing volumes of water was purged <br /> from each monitoring well All purged water was contained on-site in DOT approved 55-gallon <br /> drums pending analytical results Groundwater samples were collected from each well after <br /> stabilization of groundwater parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, temperature) Water <br /> samples were collected using dedicated disposable bailers Field purge logs are contained in <br /> Attachment 1 <br /> Groundwater samples were placed on ice and transported under chain-of-custody protocol to <br /> state-certified Sequoia Analytical in Redwood City, California All samples were analyzed for <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) using EPA method 8020, and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) using modified EPA method 8015 <br /> Dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and BTEX constituents were not detected in monitoring wells <br /> MW1, MW4, MW5 and MW6 The sample collected from MW2 contained ethylbenzene, and <br /> TPHg at 6 2 and 120 parts per billion (ppb), respectively The sample collected from MW3 <br /> contained ethylbenzene and TPHg at 63 and 600 ppb, respectively The ethylbenzene levels in <br /> wells MW2 and MW3 were below the Primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for <br /> ethylbenzene established by the Department of Health Services Laboratory results are <br /> summarized in Table 2. Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation are presented <br /> in Attachment 2 <br /> On March 10, 1994 approximately 1,100 gallons of stored monitoring well purge water was <br /> transported under non-hazardous manifest to Enviropur West (PRC) in Patterson, California for <br /> disposal <br /> 15000211QR-1994 FNL 2 <br />