My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0082147 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PIPER
>
1739
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0082147 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 3:44:48 PM
Creation date
6/11/2020 3:28:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0082147
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
1739
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PIPER
STREET_TYPE
PL
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
25531034
ENTERED_DATE
6/3/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
1739 W PIPER PL
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The US EPA recommended Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for nitrate in drinking <br /> water is 10 mg/L-N. In a worst-case situation, the maximum buildup of nitrates in the <br /> aquifer from the use of on-site septic systems on the Site is predicted to be 9.7 mg/L-N <br /> for a four-bedroom house, 10.7 mg/L-N for a five-bedroom house, or 11.6 mg/L-N for a <br /> six-bedroom house. <br /> There are three mitigating factors that should be considered, however, when evaluating <br /> whether or not this Site is likely to impact ground water with nitrate: <br /> • The Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is a conservative method for <br /> determining potential impacts, and actual nitrate loading experienced on the Site <br /> over time may be less than predicted. The requirement by San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department that the calculation use rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration data to determine ground-water recharge is particularly <br /> conservative, as it does not include consideration of regional recharge from <br /> irrigation water or surface water sources. <br /> • Based on the clay soil type present on the Site, it is likely that adsorption of <br /> nitrate ions to clay will occur as percolating effluent travels downward through the <br /> vadose zone. The soil factors discussed in the Hantzsche and Finnemore paper <br /> may not reflect the true nitrate reduction experienced as the effluent travels down <br /> through the vadose zone. <br /> • According to the San Joaquin County map reviewed, several wells in the area <br /> have been tested for nitrate; none are exhibiting nitrate levels above 10 mg/L-N. <br /> Nitrate was detected in the on-site domestic well at a concentration of 4.1 mg/L- <br /> N. The test results suggest that residential development in the area has not <br /> adversely impacted water quality. <br /> Based on the factors discussed above, the actual nitrate impact to the ground water <br /> may be less than predicted. Recent San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department policy has been to evaluate each project on a case-by-case basis to <br /> determine whether additional measures to mitigate nitrate should be employed. <br /> LOGE 20-21 Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.