My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013437
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTYWIDE
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
GP-92-10
>
SU0013437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2020 8:44:56 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 10:06:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013437
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
GP-92-10
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
COUNTYWIDE
ENTERED_DATE
6/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
0 COUNTYWIDE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gr;�� <br /> 191992 <br /> �UiV)h)�,VI 1 UCYCLVI �riG <br /> PLANNING DIVISION; ucp j <br /> October 6, 1992 <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Division <br /> Contact Person: Jim Van Buren <br /> 1810 E . Hazelton Ave . <br /> Stockton, Ca . <br /> 95205 <br /> Re: Application #s GP-92-10 & ZR-92-12 <br /> Dear Ji.:., <br /> We are property owners in this specific area affected by the <br /> county ' s zoning and general plan change. We are the owners of <br /> the 6-plex located at 3303 Franklin Ave. ,Stockton. This property <br /> is currently in escrow for sale . During this escrow period, the <br /> zoning and general plan were changed by the county in late <br /> August and reclassified from a conforming use to a non-conforming <br /> use (single family residence) . <br /> The prospective purchaser will now not close. escrow until the <br /> property can be reclassified to a conforming use again. The <br /> purchaser has good reason not to close escrow with the current <br /> zoning and general plan designation in place . The zoning law <br /> currently states that if the improvements are more than 50% <br /> destroyed, the the property owner cannot rebuild unless it is <br /> a single family residence . The owner would lose the income <br /> producing power of this property. This location appears to be <br /> a very undesirable location for a single family residence as <br /> it lies directly behind a liquor store and a commercial strip. <br /> In the event of a disaster, the owner would be left with a <br /> vacant lot which would be nearly valueless because of the <br /> zoning. The insurance coverage for the property will now require <br /> an additional $400 per year in premium because of possible costs <br /> of demolition if the structure were more than 50% destroyed <br /> according to current zoning requirements. <br /> PAGE 1 OF 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.