Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Harlan Knoll, R E H S <br /> Apri128, 2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The monitoring wells were purged with a 12-volt battery operated submersible pump and <br /> sampled with a discharge rate of less than 1 L/mmute Field measured water quality parameters <br /> were measured using a Cambridge Scientific Industries Hydan Conductivity Temperature pH <br /> Tester The appropriate information was logged onto the field sampling forms Well purging <br /> activities and the field measured water quality parameters are documented on the forms included <br /> in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater samples from each well were collected into four 40-mL glass vials with Teflon <br /> septum lids Following sample collection, each sample bottle was labeled with the sample <br /> designation, date and tune, and the initials of the sampler The sample bottles were then placed <br /> into an ice chest maintained at the temperature available from its also containing a bed of <br /> crushed ice, and its melt water, placed there at the start of the sampling day The ice was not <br /> allowed to completely melt before it was replaced <br /> The sample number, date, and time was entered onto a chain-of-custody form that included the <br /> request for analysis of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range (TPH-g),the volatile <br /> aromatic hydrocarbon compounds(benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers), <br /> the fuel oxygenates tertiary-Butyl alcohol (TBA), Methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MtBE), Di- <br /> isopropyl.Ether(DIPE), Ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ELBE), and tertiary-Amyl methyl ether <br /> (TAME)by U S E P A Method 8260B <br /> The samples and chain-of-custody documentation were then delivered to STL San Francisco <br /> (CA DHS ELAP#2496) of Pleasanton, California on March 22, 2004 <br /> 3 0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Copies of the laboratory analytical reports prepared by STL San Francisco and the cham-of- <br /> custody documentation are contained in Attachment B All available previous analytical data are <br /> also summarized in Attachment C <br /> Groundwater from MW-3 was reported with 76 pg/L TPH-gasoline All other method 8260B <br /> analytes were reported as"N D" at their respective reporting limits <br /> Groundwater from MW4 was reported with 530 µg/L TPH-gasoline The aromatic <br /> hydrocarbons wee reported as follows benzene 14 gg/L, toluene 2 2 gg/L, ethylbenzene 6 4 <br /> µg/L, and total xylene isomers 4 1 µg/L All method 8260B fuel oxygenates were reported as <br /> "N D " at their respective reporting hmits <br /> H 20 G E 0 L A GROUNDWATER CONSULTANCY <br />