Laserfiche WebLink
(- I <br /> VvATC <br /> . A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> details and VET test methodologies, as well as additional tasks such as a groundwater receptor <br /> survey ATC agreed to contact the Fund to discuss additional pre-approval requirements It is <br /> not anticipated the change of scope will exceed the amount previously pre-approved by the <br /> Fund on November 1997 <br /> QUARTERLY MONITORING ACTIVITIES <br /> ATC performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling on July 9, 1999 Field work <br /> included measuring the depth-to-water in wells MW1 through MW6 and purging and sampling <br /> the water from wells MW2, MW3, MW4 in addition to the nearby Thornton No 2 Municipal <br /> Supply Well (Supply Well) The samples were analyzed for the presence of dissolved petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons <br /> Depth to water measurements were collected on July 9, 1999 from monitoring wells MW1 <br /> through MW6 The water table elevation has decreased an average of 1 57 feet in the monitoring <br /> wells since the last monitoring event in April 1999 Groundwater beneath the site generally <br /> flows in a westerly direction at an average gradient 0 0007 ft/ft, or approximately 4 foot/mile, <br /> with apparent mounding in vicinity of MW3 Historically, groundwater beneath the site <br /> generally flows in a westerly direction Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table <br /> 1 A groundwater gradient map for the July 1999 monitoring episode is shown on Figure 2 <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW2, MW3, and MW4 after purging and <br /> stabilization of physical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature) The <br /> monitoring wells were purged and sampled according to ATC's Field Procedures on file with <br /> PHS/EHD Monitoring well purge logs are included in Attachment 1 Furthermore, ATC and <br /> coordinated with San Joaquin County Utility Maintenance Division personnel and collected a <br /> water sample from the sampling port of the Supply Well <br /> Collected groundwater samples were placed on ice and transported under chain-of-custody to <br /> State-certified Sequoia Analytical laboratory (FLAP #1210) Samples were analyzed for <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA method 8020, TPHg by EPA <br /> method modified 8015, and methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) by EPA method 8020 <br /> RESULTS <br /> Laboratory analyses detected only concentrations of TPHg at 2,500 parts per billion (ppb) and <br /> xylenes at 37 ppb in the sample collected from well MW4 The water sample collected from <br /> MW4 reported benzene was below the laboratory detection limit of 10 ppb It should be noted <br /> the laboratory detection limit for sample MW4 was multiplied by a factor 20 due to the elevated <br /> concentration of TPHg Groundwater samples collected from wells MW2, MW3, and the nearby <br /> . Supply Well contained no detectable concentrations of BTEX, TPHg, or MTBE These <br /> analytical results are generally consistent with historical levels <br /> w 1625821quartlyl2gr-1999 doc 4 <br />