Laserfiche WebLink
' TPH concentrations from four stockpile samples were 220, 430, 440, and 1,100 milligrams per <br /> '• kilogram (mg/kg) These results are presented in Appendix B - Kleinfelder Reports <br />' Kleinfelder proposed to aerate the stockpiled excavation soil at the Forward, Inc Class II <br /> Landfill Facility (landfarm), Stockton Kleinfelder's Soil Remediation Work Plan was submitted <br />' to the Regional Board and San Joaquin County The Regional Board, as the lead agency, <br /> requested that the stockpiled soil be re-sampled Soil with TPH concentrations of less than <br /> 1,000 mg/kg could be transported to the landfarm <br />' During October 1987, the stockpiled soil was segregated and approximately 325 cubic yards of <br /> soil with TPH concentrations of less than 1,000 mg/kg was transported to the landfarm The <br />' remaining 75 cubic yards was placed on new plastic sheeting and re-sampled Soil with TPH <br /> concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/kg was mixed with clean soil One composite sample <br /> made up of five discrete samples was collected from the soil stockpile remaining on site The <br /> results of this analysis was 400 mg/kg TPH Because the concentration was less than 1,000 <br /> mg/kg TPH, the remaining soil was also transported to the landfarm <br />' The 400 cubic yards of soil from AT&T Lodi Facility were transported to the landfarm for <br /> additional remediation and ultimate disposal The soil was not manifested because results of <br /> sampling showed concentrations of hydrocarbons were less than 1,000 mg/kg TPH The soil <br />' was remediated at the landfarm by aeration and discing according to Air Pollution Control <br /> District guidelines Results of soil remediation were documented by Kleinfelder in their May <br /> 01988 "Soil Remediation Report, AT&T Microwave Site, Lodi, California" (Appendix B) <br />' Confirmation soil samples collected from the remediated soil and submitted for analyses <br /> indicated that the soil had a concentration of less than 300 mg/kg TPH and that the soil could <br /> be used at the landfill for cover material <br />' Joaquin County was the lead oversight agency In a letter dated June 26, 1990, <br /> By 1990 San Joaq ty g g Y <br /> San Joaquin County requested that site investigations be re-opened, based on authority granted <br />' by the Regional Board's Underground Storage Tank Pilot Program The County's request was <br /> based on its concern for potential impacted soil remaining in place in a portion of the excavation, <br /> t given the TPH concentration reported from over-excavation sample SS-07 (18 feet below ground <br /> surface at a concentration of 21 mg/kg), the high site soil permeability, and shallow depth to <br /> ground water at the site <br />' In late October and early November 1990 FSE drilled five soil borings within and near the <br /> former excavation (Figure 3 - Worksite Plan) Three of those soil borings were converted to <br />' ground water monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3) Soil boring B-2Y was terminated <br /> at an approximate depth of 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) due to auger refusal caused by <br /> construction debris A grab composite sample of soil cuttings, reported to contain asphalt chips, <br />' was collected and analyzed at the direction of a San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services/Environmental Health Division(PHS/EHD) representative The concentration of Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel (TPH-D) in that sample was reported at 110 mg/Kg <br /> 1 <br />' F 169351861CLOSURE RPT 2 Environmental Science&Engineering Inc <br />