Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> • Working To Restore Nature <br /> Composite soil samples collected from the stockpiled soil contained non-detectable to moderate <br /> levels of petroleum hydrocarbons Analytical results of soil composite samples are summarized <br /> in Table 1 <br /> Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Attachment 2 <br /> Other Site Activities <br /> Subsequent to the discovery of an oily liquid substance in the storm drain inlet and piping Roto- <br /> Rooter was contracted to clean the storm drain piping using a water betting tool Approximately <br /> 700 gallons of sludge and liquid removed from the storm drain system was contained in DOT <br /> certified 55 gallon drums which were labeled and remain on-site pending proper disposal <br /> During confirmation sampling activities on November 12, 1993, the eastern sidewall of the <br /> excavation collapsed under its own weight Monitoring well MW 1 was partially contained in <br /> the collapsed sidewall Recent rains had apparently destabilized the excavation's sidewalls <br /> Approximately 14 feet of casing remain in the ground <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br />• Field observations and analytical data indicate that vertical migration of hydrocarbons through <br /> the soil has not exceeded 17 feet below surface grade and that lateral migration was not <br /> extensive Analytical results of excavation confirmation samples indicate that all impacted soil <br /> has been removed Excavated soil should be treated on-site via aeration and subsequently <br /> backfilled into the open excavation, or as an alternative, impacted soil should be disposed of at <br /> an appropriate landfill and the open excavation backfilled with clean native and imported fill <br /> Laboratory analyses of water samples collected from site monitoring wells and the open <br /> excavation indicate groundwater hydrocarbon impaction is limited to the immediate vicinity of <br /> the former tank pit No analytes have been detected in water samples collected in downgradient <br /> well MW4, or upgradient wells MW2 and MW3, indicating groundwater underlying the site has <br /> not been significantly impacted The relatively low transmissivity of the soil types at the site <br /> impede the movement of dissolved hydrocarbons <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the analytical results of samples collected from the stockpiled soil, RESNA proposes <br /> remediation of the soil by on-site aeration with subsequent backfill into the open excavation <br /> Prior to backfilling, "representative sampling" of the remediated soil must be conducted to verify <br /> successful remediation PHS/EHD suggests that one sample per 25 cubic yards be analyzed for <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons However, recognizing that sampling larger soil volumes at this <br /> frequency would generate inordinate expense, RESNA recommends that the methodology <br /> 1500591SXR-0194 FNL 4 <br />