ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012646 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

... .� ._ ,, ! ., 4 µ letter GTI was contacted by the district and told to correct the problem concerning the rejection of the Problem Assessment Report. n plan to re-camp October 18, 1990, GTI submitted a work p . required soil borings-23 On December 17 , 1990, the rovalrfor thecontactedMs. tng Margaret Lagorio on what was delaying the app ' of soils at monitoring wells 6 , 7, and S. She indicated that she had ter, to her secretary on December 6 to be typed concerning given a let this matter and that she would give a verbal ok to the work plan site. She further indicated that she submitted by UTI on reboring the with a letter. When would follow the verbal approval up plan. The completed, GTI could complete their work on the clean up district contacted Mr. Bob Bird dof GTI Land relayed M to MrS. �oBird sthat ahead. from the county" . The it wanted this project brought to a speedy conclusion- Ms. Lagorio sent a letter to the district dated December 17, 1990, indicating that permits would need obebtained,c48onour me notice to her office prior to soil boring, ofstrand the uiof 15 boring holes, the submission of a health and x , 199 24 submission of a draft Final Remedial Plan by March 15, On February 20, 1991 , the district contactedldTIasnot gto tthe pelat in the reboring. GTI indicated that theyfrom GTI had from the county until a workers compensation certificatestill had not been submitted. They complied with the request, in but received the permit, The district istr ctCOntacindicateddthatSJCPHS theapermits tohwas einythe issuing the permit. e county' mail. On March 6, 1991, new soil samples were taken at the site by GTI. The completed Problem Assessment Report dated April 19, 1991, was d e submitted to the district and SJCPHS for review an1991,itindicating district received a letter from SJCPHS dated July I1, current that they agreed with GTI's Problem Asnessment Report but " • • data shows the contaminated groundwater has moved and more site investigation is needed to establish the extenteodf contamination n , theSJCPHS _ appropriate remediation plan can be develop .gation by additional agency required an additional work plan, investimonitoring wells and finally a draft Remedial Action Pian The agency also has extent of the contamination had been defined. ly sampling of the requested additional reports concerning the quarter monitoring wells." The district contacted Ms. Margaret Lagorio of SJCPHS on August 5, 1991, and asked for a meeting of the SJthis, CVRWprojocB, Senator After Patrick Johnston, and the district concerning of two weeks' it was determined several phone calls over the space that a meeting was not forthcoming as Mr. Gordon Boggs of CVRWQCOf B T would not attend a meeting unless he 1�Pepresentativethe fromeCSenator the meeting. Ms. Carol HemminSer, p - - - -- y on this project_ be that a historbe completed and what specific results would-the-district-desire- -at_-the-cone-ust of a meeting with the various agencies.