Laserfiche WebLink
31 January 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0125 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> below surface grade A total of eleven soil samples were collected from the sidewalls and floor of <br /> the excavation, under the direction of Ms Margaret Lagono of the PHS-EHD TPH-g was detected <br /> in soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the excavation at concentrations as high as 1,600 parts <br /> per million(ppm, reported as milligrams per kilogram, sample 7-East) Toluene, ethylbenzene and <br /> xylenes were detected in excavation soil samples at concentrations ranging from 0 0072 ppm <br /> (toluene, 3-East) to 100 ppm (xylenes, 7-East) Benzene was not detected in any of the samples <br /> collected Under the authorization of the PHS-EHD, approximately 44 tons (32 cubic yards) of pea <br /> gravel and crushed rock were placed on the bottom of the excavation The pea gravel and crushed <br /> rock was used to fill the excavation above the free standing water in the excavation The excavation <br /> I was then backfilled using approximately 240 cubic yards of clean fill sand, and 14 cubic yards of <br /> gravel were used to cover the excavation Results of the excavation were detailed in AGE Quarterly <br /> Repot t, dated 26 February 1996 <br /> 26 SOIL STOCKPILE AND PURGE WATER SAMPLING <br /> Stockpiled soil was sampled by representatives of AGE on 05 January 1996 Four samples were <br /> collected from the stockpiled soil and from containerized purged water stored on-site TPH-g was <br /> detected in stockpiled soil samples at concentrations as high as 480 ppm (SP3) BTE&X were <br /> detected 3n stockpiled soil samples at concentrations as high as 13 ppm (xylene, SP2) Hydrocarbons <br /> were not detected in water samples collected from the containerized purged water Results of the <br /> sampling were detailed in the above-mentioned AGE Quat tet ly Report, dated 26 February 1996 <br /> 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 3 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 05 November 1996, the depth to ground water to all wells was measured relative to the casing <br /> tops using a Solinst water level meter The relative ground water elevation in each well and <br /> prevailing hydraulic gradient were determined from these data Ground water depth data is presented <br /> in Table I- Relative Ground Water Elevations <br /> After depth to water measurements were performed, a pre-cleaned bailer or submersible pump was <br /> used to remove approximately eight to twelve gallons of standing water from monitoring wells MW- <br /> 1, MW-5, MW-6 , MW-7, MW-8, MW-9 and MW-10 A pre-cleaned PVC bailer was used to <br /> remove approximately one-half of a gallon of standing water from MW-2 T stabilization parameters, <br /> 1 temperature,pH and conductivity, were measured at regular intervals in each purged well using an <br /> ICM Water Analyzer Purged water was stored on-site in DOT drums Ground water stabilization <br /> and field data sheets are included in Appendix A <br />