Laserfiche WebLink
Lammersville School District March 3, 1992 <br /> 02320 2124 Page 3 <br /> 3 4 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVEYING <br /> After completing each boring, groundwater monitoring wells were installed The wells were <br /> constructed using 2-inch-diameter, 0 020-inch-slot, PVC well screen, and blank casing A filter pack <br /> consisting of #3 Monterey Sand was placed in the annular space of the well from the bottom of the <br /> boring up to one foot above the screened interval A one-foot-thick layer of 1/2-inch bentonite pellets <br /> was set above the filter pack in order to seal the well The remaining annulus was then sealed with <br /> a neat cement slurry The wellhead was protected with a watertight traffic-rated road box The road <br /> box was elevated slightly to facilitate drainage of surface waters away from the well A locking cap <br /> sealed the wellhead Well completion details are presented in Appendix A <br /> On January 29,1992, the new groundwater monitoring wells were developed to remove fines and <br /> enhance hydraulic communication between the wells and surrounding aquifer Approximately 8 to 10 <br /> well volumes were removed from each well During development, pH, temperature, and conductivity <br /> readings were recorded All water generated during development and sampling was stored on site in <br /> Department of Transportation IDOT) approved drums pending proper disposal <br /> Fallowing development, the new wells were surveyed relative <br /> Y to existing wells in order to establish <br /> vertical control <br /> 4 0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> in response to a request by Ms Margaret Lagono of SJCEHD, data collected by McCain Environmental <br /> Services (McCain) on May 20 and August 27, 1991 have been included in this report The methods <br /> used to collect these samples have not been communicated to Groundwater Technology The data <br /> collected by McCain in 1991 and by Groundwater Technology in 1992 were used to prepare maps of <br /> the potentiometnc surface (Figures 3, 4, and 5), dissolved TPH-G (Figures 6, 8, and 10), and dissolved <br /> benzene (Figures 7, 9, and 11) Monitoring data are summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3 <br /> On January 14, 1992, groundwater monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 were <br /> gauged to determine depth to water (DTW) and to check for the presence of liquid-phase <br /> hydrocarbons The wells were then purged of four well volumes and allowed to recover to at least 80 <br /> percent of the static water level Samples collected were decanted into 40-milliliter glass vials and <br />. delivered to a State of California certified laboratory along with a chain-of-custody manifest The <br /> samples were analyzed for the presence of BTEX and TPH-G using EPA Methods 5030/8020/8015 <br /> 21 240SRl RPT - IF-1 ";-� <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> TECHNOLOGY <br />