Laserfiche WebLink
T � • <br /> 07 May 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0466 <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br /> Composite No. 2 = SP4-3 + SPS-1 + SP5-4 + SP6-3 + S 7-3 <br /> Composite No. 3 = SP9-1 + SP9-3 + SPI1-1 + SPI1-3 <br /> Composite No. 4 = SP8-1 + SP8-2 + SP10-1 + SP10-3 <br /> Composite No. 5 = SP12-1 + SP12-3 + SP15-1 + SP 15-2 <br /> Composite No. 6 = SP13-1 + SP 13-3 + SP14-1 + SP14- <br /> Composite No. 7 = SP16-1 + SP19-2 + SP19-4 <br /> Composite No. 8 = SP 17-2 + SP 18-2 + SP20-1 <br /> Total lead, barium and chromium concentrations in various composite les were high enough <br /> to trigger analysis of the samples for the soluble forms of the metals; only total lead in composite <br /> sample No. 1 was high enough(50,500 mg/kg) to classify the sample as hazardous under California <br /> regulations. Analysis of the five samples comprising Composite Sample No. 1 individually detected <br /> total lead concentrations of 28 mg/kg, 33 mg/kg, 313 mg/kg, 839 mg/kg and 17 mg/kg. <br /> Soluble lead was detected at concentrations slightly exceeding the STLC of 5 mg/1 in three <br /> composite samples -No. 1 at 7 mg/1, No. 3 at 5 mg/1 and No. 6 at 9 . These results define the <br /> soil as hazardous waste for disposal purposes. Resampling the points u ilized to make composite <br /> No. 1, the individual samples with total lead exceeding 50 mg/kg had soluble lead concentrations <br /> of 0.02 mg/1 and less than 0.02 mg/l. These results would not lead to a hazardous waste classification <br /> for essentially the same soil. Locations of discreet soil samples analyzed for lead are illustrated on <br /> Figure 7. More characterization of lead in the soil is necessary to identify soil that may require <br /> treatment for soluble lead. <br /> Composite Sample No. 1,by virtue of its elevated lead and other metals (and notable organic debris <br /> content in the stockpiles), and Composite Sample No. 5, believed to contain ash material, were <br /> analyzed for volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic co>1npounds, pesticides and <br /> chlorinated herbicides. No compounds in any of these classes were detected in the composite <br /> samples. <br /> In addition to the above,the two composite samples were analyzed for totz I petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> as motor oil and diesel (TPH-mo and TPH-d, respectively), and for c rrosivity, ignitability and <br /> reactivity. Neither composite sample exhibited ignitability or reactivity with sulfides, cyanide or <br /> water. The TPH-mo concentrations reported are not excessively high but individual samples should <br /> be analyzed to verify these concentrations as representative. There is melt d organic material visible <br /> in the piles, which may be a source for the motor oil range hydrocarbons detected in the soil. The <br /> samples do not have corrosive characteristics that would classify the material as hazardous. <br /> In June 2000, additional soil samples were collected from the various sol stockpiles to composite <br /> for analysis for dioxins. Dioxins are a combustion product of hydrocarbons in the presence of <br /> chlorine or that contain chlorine, such as PVC,pentacholophenol(PCP) and trichlorophenol(TCP), <br /> both of the latter two known to have been utilized as a wood preservative on the site. The most well- <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />