My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS_1992-1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS_1992-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2020 2:56:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2020 1:38:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
1992-1999
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
标签
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS -5- <br /> MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> the Discharger needs to conduct a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TIE) to <br /> determine the cause and develop a corrective action plan. <br /> 20. The Discharger has had repeated violations of Effluent Limitation 1 in Order <br /> No. 88-124 for chromium, capper and TDS. The Discharger was notified of the <br /> violations by letter dated 30 September 1991. Operational changes were <br /> implemented to prevent future violations. Due to the complexity of the <br /> treatment plant it is critical that operations be maintained by adequately <br /> trained personnel . <br /> 21 . The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Board have classified this <br /> discharge as a minor discharge. <br /> 22. The beneficial uses of the Calaveras River, Upper Mormon Slough, and the <br /> Stockton Diverting Canal are municipal and domestic, industrial , and <br /> agricultural supply; recreation; aesthetic enjoyment; navigation; ground <br /> water recharge, fresh water replenishment; and preservation and enhancement <br /> of fish, wildlife and other aquatic resources. <br /> 23. The beneficial uses of the underlying ground water are municipal and <br /> domestic, industrial , and agricultural supply. <br /> 24. The aquatic standard of 11 pg/l for hexavalent chromium represents the most <br /> significant limitation to operation of the water treatment plant. Water <br /> within the treatment plant which contains hexavalent chromium exceeding <br /> specific set points for in-line meters will prompt automatic shut down or <br /> recycle modes. The system design requires optimum performance to achieve <br /> this effluent limit. Bench tests have indicated that the electrochemical <br /> process is effective in reducing high concentrations of chromium to meet the <br /> 11 pg/1 chromium effluent limit only after filtration of the effluent. The <br /> bench tests also indicated that the TDS concentrations of the <br /> electrochemically treated ground water should be the same as the influent <br /> or lower. Arsenic in the ground water taken from the intermediate wells is <br /> virtually nonexistent and copper has rarely been measured at concentrations <br /> exceeding 6.5 pg/l . <br /> 25. On 11 April 1991 the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted the <br /> California Inland Surface Water Plan (Plan) . On 19 November 1992 the SWRCB <br /> adopted amendments to the Plan. These requirements are consistent with that <br /> Plan. <br /> 26. The Board has considered antidegradation pursuant to 40 CFR 131. 12 and State <br /> Water Resources Control Board Resolution 68-16 and finds that the permitted <br /> discharge is consistent with those provisions. This Order provides for an <br /> increase in the volume and mass of pollutants discharged. There is no <br /> evidence to indicate that the increase in discharge will cause significant <br /> impacts on aquatic life, which is the beneficial use most likely affected <br /> by the pollutants discharged. The increase in the discharge allows maximum <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.