Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET <br /> 8 <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIRMENTS ORDER NO.R5-2003-XXXX <br /> SPX CORPORATION <br /> MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Section 1.4.1, the USEPA conversion factor was used in expressing the dissolved copper criterion <br /> as total recoverable. Acute and chronic effluent concentration allowances (ECAs) were set equal <br /> to the adjusted acute and chronic copper criterion, and the most limiting long-term average (LTA) <br /> discharge condition for copper was determined using Table 1 of the SIP, using a coefficient of <br /> variation of 0.6. The average monthly effluent limitation(AMEL) and maximum daily effluent <br /> limitation (MDEL) were then calculated using multipliers in Table 2 of the SIP as shown below: <br /> WATER QUALITY BASED EFFLLENT LLrIITATIONS <br /> Copper Total <br /> Number of Observations >20 <br /> Effluent Sladmitm 80.0 <br /> Dilution Credit 0 <br /> ECA acute(@ 44 mg(L(pM)hardness as CaCO3) 6.5 <br /> Percent of Observations Below Detection >90% <br /> Coefficient of Variation Default 0.6 <br /> Litnitin LTA(acute)= ECA acs*Table 1 Acute Multiplier) 2.1 <br /> Sampling Req=cv n) <4;mo <br /> AMEL LTA*Table'-\fEL Multiplier) 3.3 6 <br /> MDEL LTA*Table 2 MDEL Multiplier) 6.5 b <br /> New final average monthly(3.3 µg/L(ppb)(0.02 pounds per day) @ 44 mg/L (ppm)hardness as <br /> CaCO3) and daily maximum (6.5 gg/L(ppb) @ 44 mg/L(ppm)hardness as CaCO3)effluent <br /> limitations for copper(total) have been established in this Order in accordance with Sections 1.3 <br /> and 1.4 of the SIP using the adjusted copper criteria. These limitations will be adjusted <br /> accordingly with results of corresponding receiving water monitoring for hardness. The <br /> Discharger operates treatment processes specific to the removal of copper. With proper operation <br /> of the existing treatment facilities, results of monitoring indicate the Discharger is capable of <br /> meeting the new daily maximum effluent limitation, therefore a time schedule for compliance with <br /> this limitation is not included in this new Order. However,results of monitoring are not sufficient <br /> to determine if the Discharger can meet the new monthly average effluent limitation for copper of <br /> 3.3 gg/L(ppb) @ 44 mg/L(ppm) hardness as CaCO3. Data submitted by the Discharger indicates <br /> that, when the facility is properly operated,effluent concentrations of copper are less than 5 ggfL <br /> (ppb). Historical data are not of sufficient quality to determine compliance with the monthly <br /> average limitation. Detection of copper to 0.5 gg/L (ppb) is feasible in accordance with the SIP. <br /> This Order includes a Provision which requires the Discharger to collect data sufficient to <br /> determine compliance with this new monthly average effluent limitation for copper. <br /> As provided in Section 2.1 of the SIP, a time schedule is included in this Order to allow the <br /> Discharger to achieve compliance with the new monthly average effluent limitations for copper. <br /> In accordance with the SIP, Sections 2.2, a numeric monthly average interim limitation for copper <br /> is established in this Order based upon current treatment facility performance. Since the treatment <br /> facilities can, when properly operated,produce and effluent with copper concentrations less than <br /> 5 µg/L(ppb), this Order includes a performance based interim average monthly effluent limitation <br /> for copper set at this historical limit of detection of 5 gg/L(ppb). If a compliance schedule <br />