Laserfiche WebLink
LM <br /> 2801 West Lane,Stockton <br /> May 2005 <br /> �. Page 2 <br /> L. The screened intervals, completed depths, filter pack intervals of DMW-1 to DMW-7 <br /> included in Table 1 "Monitoring Well Construction Results"of the reports and previous <br /> quarterly sampling reports appeared to be incorrect The numbers in Table 1 are contrary to <br /> L. the numbers reported in Table 1 of Closure Request Report dated July 2001 prepared by URS, i <br /> quarterly sampling field records, and EHD official inspection reports at the time of well <br /> ' construction. Please review the original well logs and make any necessary corrections to <br /> Table 1 in all future reports. <br /> URS had previously submitted to EHD a well survey in Section-3.2 and Appendix A of the <br /> LM above-mentioned Closure Request Report. URS reported in Section 3.2 that only one domestic <br /> well completed to 125 feet bsg within 2,000 feet south of the site. Appendix A,comprised <br /> of a table and a map,identified 27 wells in the area. The radius of the circle on the map was <br /> not specified,but the radius of the circle appeared to far exceed 2,000 feet. Sincea distance <br /> scale was not provided on the map,it is not known which wells.labeled on the map are <br /> actually within 2,000 feet of the site. Also,the specific domestic well discussed in Section <br /> 3.2 could not be identified on the map or table. According to the-well-survey of the <br /> L" neighboring property, San Joaquin Catholic Cemetery,multiple private drinking and- <br /> irrigation wells existed at the cemetery and St Joseph's Hospital. None of these wells was <br /> identified or labeled on the well survey in Appendix A. Since the Harding Cemetery is <br /> �+* located immediately adjacent to the site,it is likely many of these wells exist within 2,000 of <br /> the site. The well survey in Appendix A is therefore potentially underreported. Submit a <br /> comprehensive 2,000-foot well receptor survey to EHD or demonstrate the adequacy of the <br /> �.. existing report by June 15,2005. The well survey should include a properly labeled map <br /> with distance scale and a 2,000-foot radius map,a list of the identified wells with <br /> ' corresponding addresses and well construction log. Reliance solely on reviews of Water <br /> Well Drillers Reports at the California Division of Water Resources may be inadequate. <br /> Conduct a door-to-door well survey if required. A complete well survey with all wells <br /> existing within 2,000 feet of the site is required before a site can be considered for No <br /> L Further Action status. <br /> Donna Heran,RENS,Director <br /> V Environmental CSrenpior <br /> Health Department <br /> Jeffrey Wong REHS Nuel C.Henderson,Jr_,RG <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit N LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV Ze <br /> c: URS Corporation—Anthony Mindling,RG <br /> c: RWQCB,Central Valley Region—James Barton,RG <br /> 1.. <br /> L <br /> _ F <br /> t <br /> L <br /> 1 <br />