Laserfiche WebLink
t� <br /> • Detections of tetrachloroethene (PCE)(not previously reported in Site groundwater samples) <br /> were limited to the northern perimeter of the Site. The occurrence of PCE is apparently <br /> unrelated to the same source as the 1,2-DCA, and is considered to be the result of a separate <br /> release not associated with the underground storage tanks. <br /> 1.2 Purpose of Investigation <br /> The penetration depth of the Stratoproberm was limited at the Site to a maximum depth of 65 feet <br /> bgs in the 2002 investigation. While the data collected provided good lateral delineation of the <br /> extent of 1,2-DCA groundwater impacts, data demonstrating the stability of the 1,2-DCA <br /> contaminant plume,its occurrence within the zone of historic low groundwater levels, and <br /> variations in its concentration with time are incomplete. These data gaps were identified in a <br /> letter from the SJC-EHD commenting on the 2002 1,2-DCA investigation (SJC-EHD, 2003). A <br /> copy of the letter is provided as Appendix A. The principal objective of the investigation <br /> Ir presented in this work plan is to fill those data gaps. <br /> 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK <br /> { The proposed scope of work for the additional 1,2-DCA investigation will include the following <br /> tasks: <br /> E • Coordination with regulatory agencies to finalize this work plan, and preparation of an <br /> updated health and safety plan; <br /> • Installation of two groundwater monitoring wells; <br /> • Preparations to resume quarterly groundwater monitoring,including contact with site owner <br /> regarding access, and permit application for purge water disposal; <br /> * • Completion of four quarterly groundwater sampling events and analysis of samples for total <br /> �+ petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH/D)by EPA Method 8015M and volatile organic <br /> compounds (VOCs)be EPA Method 8260B; <br /> • Submittal of Geotracker data as required by the California State Water Resources Control <br /> Board beginning with data collected during the second quarter of 2003; <br /> 1 • Preparation of letter reports following each sampling event; and, <br /> • Preparation of a summary report following the completion of the four sampling events. <br /> Details of these tasks and the methods to be used are presented in the following sections. <br /> 3.0 FINALIZATION OF WORK PLAN AND PREPARATION <br /> OF UPDATED HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN <br /> L Following submittal of this draft work plan and its review by the SJC-EHD and RWQCB, <br /> comments will be incorporated as appropriate into a final document. Upon the approval of this <br /> work plan, a site-specific health and safety plan (HSP)will be developed in compliance with the <br /> L California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CAL/OSHA)Hazardous Waste <br /> Operations and Emergency Response(HAZWOPER) standard (8 California Code of Regulations <br /> x 5192). The HSP will be prepared under the direction of a certified industrial hygienist. <br /> V <br /> 2 <br />