Laserfiche WebLink
procedures that can be used to assess the fate of chemicals in the environment and estimate <br /> environmental attenuation factors for specific waste constituents and site conditions. <br /> Detailed information on many environmental fate characteristics may prove difficult or <br /> impractical to obtain. Therefore, the analysis may be approached initially in a simplified <br /> manner,by using more easily obtainable information on some of the key characteristics and <br /> conservative assumptions about the remaining characteristics to approximate the minimum <br /> expected attenuation. For example,in the analysis of the threat posed to surface waters the <br /> lowest anticipated initial dilution of the waste or leachate into surface waters can be used <br /> as a measure of attenuation. If this type of simplistic analysis can clearly demonstrate that <br /> waste constituents cannot adversely impact water quality, then further and more detailed <br /> analysis may be unnecessary. If a simplified analysis gives inconclusive results or shows <br /> that the potential for water quality degradation may exist, the waste discharger may wish <br /> to obtain detailed information on heretofore undetermined environmental fate <br /> characteristics in order to refine the analysis <br /> In many cases, resources may not permit a detailed environmental fate analysis for the <br /> selection of attenuation factors. This is especially true where a discharger requires a <br /> preliminary idea of how a waste will be classified. For these cases it is proposed that a <br /> "generic" environmental attenuation factor be chosen in a manner similar to that used by <br /> DHS in the setting of hazardous STLCs. The CAM SOR 3 justifies the use of a 100-fold <br /> attenuation factor,based on studies conducted by Batelle Laboratories and EPA?-34 Both <br /> studies stress that the degree of attenuation of waste constituents depends on waste-and <br /> site-specific conditions,as discussed above. It is,therefore,impossible to select an <br /> attenuation factor that will be appropriate for all wastes constituents or all disposal sites <br /> and situations. Expected landfill-to-useable ground water attenuations cited by EPA range <br /> from one to 1,000-fold,based on mathematical models and actual field data. Both the <br /> Batelle and EPA documents selected a 100-fold attenuation factor to conservatively <br /> represent average attenuation of waste constituents as leachate moves to an underground <br /> source of drinking water; however,neither study provides detailed descriptions of which <br /> waste-and site-specific conditions are best approximated by the 100-fold factor. <br /> In selecting a "generic" environmental attenuation factor for purposes of deriving <br /> designated levels, the 100-fold factor should be used in those disposal situations which <br /> provide an "average" degree of natural protection for water quality from the discharge of <br /> wastes under reasonable worst-case conditions. An example of such an average disposal <br /> situation would be a landfill in the alluvium of the Central Valley with a significant depth <br /> (i.e.,greater than 30 feet) of soil containing appreciable and continuous clay or silty-clay <br /> strata between the base of the landfill and ground water. For sites that provide less than <br /> this "average" amount of water quality protection(e.g.,high ground water or more highly <br /> permeable geologic materials--sandy soils or fractured rock),a lower environmental <br /> attenuation factor,such as one(1)or ten (10)should be chosen. Where a very low degree of <br /> natural water quality protection may exist or for situations in which the mass Ioading of <br /> J waste constituents is likely to saturate environmental attenuation processes (e.g.,the <br /> . discharge of large volumes of a liquid waste to a surface impoundment continuously over <br /> many years in an area with moderately permeable soils), a factor of one (1)should be used. <br /> A factor of 1,000 may be appropriate in areas that provide a very high degree of water <br /> Page 32 Designated Level Methodology <br />