My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008213
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
2801
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0504943
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 12:53:26 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 12:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008213
RECORD_ID
PR0504943
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0004032
FACILITY_NAME
AMERICAN MOULDING & MILLWORK (FRMR)
STREET_NUMBER
2801
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11709001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2801 WEST LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF COMBINATIONS OF CONSTITUENTS <br /> When several chemicals of concern are present in a particular waste,their interactive <br /> environmental/health effects—either additive, antagonistic,or synergistic-should be <br /> considered. However, data on the cumulative effects of chemicals is generally not available <br /> in the literature. As a conservative rule, the potential water quality impact of several <br /> constituents that manifest their effects in the same or similar manner should be assumed to <br /> be additive. Constituent groups for which this rule would likely apply include primary <br /> carcinogens,organophosphate and carbamate pesticides,halogenated organic pesticides, <br /> organic solvents,petroleum hydrocarbons, and heavy metals. <br /> Under the additivity assumption,the waste would be considered to be a 'designated waste' <br /> if the sum of the quotients obtained by dividing the concentration of each constituent by its <br /> Designated Level is greater than 1.W1 <br /> n (Concentration of Constituent), <br /> if Z > 1.0, then the waste is a 191 <br /> tai (Designated Level for Constituent), 'designated waste' <br /> This criterion could require the classification of a waste as 'designated'even if the <br /> concentrations of individual constituents are all below thein respective Designated Levels. <br /> This indicates that even if no potentially adverse water quality impact is posed by <br /> individual constituents, the combination of constituents does have the potential to impair <br /> beneficial uses of waters of the State. <br /> For example, consider a liquid waste that contains four-carcinogenic volatile_organic----- <br /> constituents in the following concentrations: <br /> Measured_ - — --- t Hypothetical- <br /> Concentration Designated <br /> in the Waste Level <br /> 1,2-Dichloroethane 50 gg/I 100 µg/1 <br /> Tetrachloroethylene 250 gg/l 400 gg/I <br /> Trichloroethylene 400 gg/I 500 gg/I <br /> Viny-I chloride-- - — - --- - - - 120 µ9/I -- - - 200 jig/1- - - - -- - -- -- -- <br /> Each constituent is below its individual Designated bevel, however... <br /> 50 + 250 + 400 + 120 = 2.5 [10] <br /> 100 400 500 200 <br /> On the basis of cumulative carcinogenic risk (E> 1.0),this waste should be classified as a . <br /> 'designated waste'. r <br /> r � <br /> i Designated Level Methodology page 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.