Laserfiche WebLink
FORMER AMERICAN FOREST PRODUCTS FACILITY Section No. 1.0 <br /> Additional 1,2-DCA Investigation and Site Conceptual Model February 2005 <br /> And Second Quarter 2004 Quarterly Monitoring Report Page 1-2 <br /> Y <br /> L - <br /> Health Service, Environmental Health Division (SJCPHS-EHD) in their letter of April 15, 2002, which <br /> included the following conditions: <br /> * • Groundwater should be sampled from a permeable zone below 80 feet below ground surface <br /> (bgs) representing historic low groundwater levels in order to define the vertical extent of <br /> groundwater contamination; and <br /> • Monitoring wells would potentially be required to demonstrate stability of the 1,2-DCA <br /> plume and decreasing concentrations with time. <br /> The 2002 work plan also provided for a cessation of quarterly groundwater monitoring while the results <br /> of the investigation were evaluated. The report of the 1,2-DCA investigation (URS,2002b)showed,based <br /> on six samples collected from five direct-push sampling locations,that: <br /> • The lateral distribution of 1,2-DCA was limited to a small area (approximately 60-foot <br /> AW radius)in the vicinity of the northeast comer of the former maintenance facility building; <br /> • Concentrations of 1,2-DCA decline with depth;and <br /> }� . Detections of tetrachloroethene (PCE) (not previously reported in site groundwater samples) <br /> were limited to the northern perimeter of the site, and are apparently unrelated to the same <br /> source as the PCE. <br /> bp <br /> However, due to site conditions limiting direct-push penetration, the maximum sampling depth was <br /> (� limited to 65 feet bgs. While the data collected provided good lateral delineation of the extent of 1,2-DCA <br /> groundwater impacts, data demonstrating the stability of the 1,2-DCA contaminant, its occurrence within <br /> the zone of historic low groundwater levels, and variations in its concentration with time were <br /> IF incomplete. These data gaps were identified in a letter from the SJCPHS-EHD commenting on the 2002 <br /> 1,2-DCA investigation (SJPHS-EHD, 2003). <br /> t <br /> 1.2 PURPOSE AND SCOPE <br /> The purpose of the work described in this report was to provide data demonstrating limited extent and <br /> stability of groundwater contaminants as a basis for site closure. The scope of work included reinstitution <br /> of quarterly groundwater monitoring and the installation of two additional wells.Lithologic and analytical <br /> data obtained from this new work have been used to update the site conceptual model, which includes a <br /> lithologic cross-section, groundwater elevation contour maps and flow direction, plots of groundwater <br /> elevation versus time, and isoconcentration maps. <br /> 1.3 REPORT FORMAT <br /> This report consists of six sections and four appendices. Section I summarizes site background <br /> { information and states the purpose and scope of this report. The scope and procedures of field activities <br /> L are described in Section 2.0. Section 3.0 reports the soil analytical results, and Section 4.0 presents the <br /> site conceptual model. Conclusions and recommendations are provided in Section 5.0, and references are <br /> i listed in Section 6.0. <br /> L <br /> Boring logs and well completion diagrams for DMW-8 and DMW-9, installed in March 2004, are <br /> f ..� included in Appendix A. Appendix B includes field documentation for water samples collected during the <br /> L <br /> * K:%Wprocess12273ri American Forest\Weil Installation Report revOI Am <br />