Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> Wells Fargo Bank, Sto�`icton Branch <br /> November 27, 1996 <br /> Page 2 <br /> A. BACKGROUND <br /> Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) <br /> Consultant conducted a Phase I ESA of the subject property in October, 1995. The <br /> following environmental issues were identified: <br /> • According to historical Sanborn fire insurance maps, a gasoline service station <br /> existed on the subject property during the 1950's. <br /> • During the site reconnaissance, Consultant observed an on-going subsurface <br /> investigation at the former Roek Construction facility adjacent, on the southeast <br /> corner of the intersection of South Wilson Way and Market Street. <br /> • The government record research indicated that a Texaco gasoline service station <br /> currently located adjacent, on the southwest corner of the intersection, is <br /> identified as a LUST site. <br /> Phase II Subsurface Investigation <br /> A Phase II Subsurface Investigation was performed by Consultant in February 1996, to <br /> further investigate the potential of an environmental impact by the former on-site service <br /> station. Soil samples were collected from five (5) geoprobe borings at depths of up to <br /> twenty-five (25) feet below ground surface (bgs). All soil samples revealed non-detectable <br /> concentrations for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) <br /> and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). Total recoverable petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TRPHs) were found at concentrations ranging from 10 parts per million <br /> (ppm) to 31 ppm, which is well below Maximum Concentration Level (MCL) of 100 ppm <br /> as set forth by the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB). <br /> Based on the above-mentioned analytical results, it was concluded that the on-site soil <br /> contamination, although below regulatory action levels, was likely caused by the spilling of <br /> waste oil and motor oil at the former on-site service station. There was no indication of <br /> diesel or gasoline contamination. Groundwater was expected at a depth of approximately <br /> 60 feet bgs, and was not sampled or tested during this subsurface investigation. <br /> Agency Correspondence <br /> Ms. Linda Turkatte of the SJCEHD contacted Consultant on May 9, 1996. Ms. Turkatte <br /> informed Consultant that the subsurface investigations at the neighboring sites had been <br /> completed, and that free floating product had been found on top of the aquifer at depths of <br /> 60 feet bgs. Assuming a southerly groundwater flow direction, Ms. Turkatte is <br /> considering the former gasoline service station at the subject property to be a potential <br /> source. Consultant informed Ms. Turkatte of the findings of the February 1996 subsurface <br /> investigation. <br /> In a letter to Client from the SJCEHD, dated July 3, 1996, Ms. Turkatte has requested that <br /> Client conduct additional Phase II activities to further investigate the extent of the <br /> groundwater contamination. The agency required the submittal of a Phase II Work Plan on <br /> or before September 6, 1996. <br />