My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
49
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506077
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 4:33:28 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 4:18:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0506077
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007187
FACILITY_NAME
WELLS FARGO BANK
STREET_NUMBER
49
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15121034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
49 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br /> Wells Fargo Bank, Sto�`icton Branch <br /> November 27, 1996 <br /> Page 2 <br /> A. BACKGROUND <br /> Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) <br /> Consultant conducted a Phase I ESA of the subject property in October, 1995. The <br /> following environmental issues were identified: <br /> • According to historical Sanborn fire insurance maps, a gasoline service station <br /> existed on the subject property during the 1950's. <br /> • During the site reconnaissance, Consultant observed an on-going subsurface <br /> investigation at the former Roek Construction facility adjacent, on the southeast <br /> corner of the intersection of South Wilson Way and Market Street. <br /> • The government record research indicated that a Texaco gasoline service station <br /> currently located adjacent, on the southwest corner of the intersection, is <br /> identified as a LUST site. <br /> Phase II Subsurface Investigation <br /> A Phase II Subsurface Investigation was performed by Consultant in February 1996, to <br /> further investigate the potential of an environmental impact by the former on-site service <br /> station. Soil samples were collected from five (5) geoprobe borings at depths of up to <br /> twenty-five (25) feet below ground surface (bgs). All soil samples revealed non-detectable <br /> concentrations for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) <br /> and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). Total recoverable petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TRPHs) were found at concentrations ranging from 10 parts per million <br /> (ppm) to 31 ppm, which is well below Maximum Concentration Level (MCL) of 100 ppm <br /> as set forth by the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB). <br /> Based on the above-mentioned analytical results, it was concluded that the on-site soil <br /> contamination, although below regulatory action levels, was likely caused by the spilling of <br /> waste oil and motor oil at the former on-site service station. There was no indication of <br /> diesel or gasoline contamination. Groundwater was expected at a depth of approximately <br /> 60 feet bgs, and was not sampled or tested during this subsurface investigation. <br /> Agency Correspondence <br /> Ms. Linda Turkatte of the SJCEHD contacted Consultant on May 9, 1996. Ms. Turkatte <br /> informed Consultant that the subsurface investigations at the neighboring sites had been <br /> completed, and that free floating product had been found on top of the aquifer at depths of <br /> 60 feet bgs. Assuming a southerly groundwater flow direction, Ms. Turkatte is <br /> considering the former gasoline service station at the subject property to be a potential <br /> source. Consultant informed Ms. Turkatte of the findings of the February 1996 subsurface <br /> investigation. <br /> In a letter to Client from the SJCEHD, dated July 3, 1996, Ms. Turkatte has requested that <br /> Client conduct additional Phase II activities to further investigate the extent of the <br /> groundwater contamination. The agency required the submittal of a Phase II Work Plan on <br /> or before September 6, 1996. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.