Laserfiche WebLink
The soil samples selected for chemical analyses were placed in a cooler chilled to <br /> approximately 4° C (40° F), and sent to SPL Laboratories of Fullerton, California via <br /> overnight courier. Sample handling, transport, and delivery to the laboratories were <br /> documented using chain-of-custody procedures, including the use of chain-of-custody <br /> forms. <br />' Monitoring Well Installation <br /> Following the collection of soil samples, soil borings B-1, B-2 and B-3 were advanced to <br /> 65 feet bgs, 70 and 65 feet bas respectively, and converted to monitoring wells MW-1, <br /> MW-2 and MW-3 respectively. Wells MW-I and MW-3 were constructed with 15 feet of <br /> four-inch inside diameter(ID),0.010-inch machine slotted, schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride <br /> (PVC)screen from approximately 50 to 65 feet bgs, and 50 feet of four-inch ID schedule <br /> 40 PVC blank casing from the ground surface to approximately 50 feet bgs. Well MW-2 <br /> was constructed with 15 feet of four-inch inside diameter(ID),0.010-inch machine slotted, <br /> schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) screen and from approximately 50 to 70 feet bgs, <br />' and 50 feet of four-inch ID schedule 40 PVC blank casing from the ground surface to <br /> approximately 50 feet bgs. <br />' The annulus between the screen and the boring was filled with #2112 Monterey Sand. The <br /> sand pack in the wells was surged with a surge block to allow the sand to settle and draw <br /> the fine grained material out of the sand pack into the wells from the bottom of the boring to <br /> approximately 2 feet above the slotted portion.. The wells were developed using a steel <br />' bailer to remove fine grained materials from the well. Approximately 1 foot of hydrated <br /> bentonite pellets were placed on top of the sand pack before grouting the wells. The wells <br /> were then grouted to the surface with Portland cement using a grout pump and tremie pipe. <br /> The seal of the wells was observed by San Joaquin County Health Department Officials. <br /> Following the sealing of the wells a traffic rated well box and locking cap were installed at <br /> each wellhead. Well construction diagrams are enclosed in Appendix C. <br /> Wellhead Surveying <br /> On February 25, 1997 the wellhead elevations and locations were surveyed by Morrow <br /> 1 Surveying, Inc. of Sacramento, California. The wellhead elevations are included in Table <br /> 1. The complete well survey is included as Appendix D. <br /> Groundwater Elevation Measurements <br /> On February 25, 1997, the static groundwater elevations were measured in the three <br /> groundwater monitoring wells by lowering a decontaminated Solinst groundwater elevation <br /> 1 probe and measuring the groundwater elevation to the nearest 0.01 foot. Well elevation ,. <br /> data are included in Table 1. Groundwater was encountered during the monitoring well <br /> installation at approximately 55 feet bgs, however the water levels rose approximately 10� <br />' feet following well installation. <br /> The calculated groundwater elevation indicates that the groundwater gradient is <br /> approximately 0.0025 to the northeast. A groundwater contour map is presented as Figure <br /> 3. <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> On February 25, 1997 the monitoring wells were purged a minimum of three well volumes <br /> . using a submersible pump. Field parameters were measured during the purging of <br />' groundwater with a Hydac conductivity/temperature/pH meter.The pH of the groundwater <br /> 7 197046a - Stockton <br />