Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Mr Harlan Knoll <br /> rAugust 9, 2001 <br /> �j Page 4 of 7 <br /> rthe well development process, temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity were measured and <br /> allowed to stabilize prior to collecting groundwater samples Groundwater purged from the wells <br /> was placed into DOT approved drums and labeled in accordance with 49 CFR part 172 and 40 <br /> rCFR part 262 Purged groundwater/ansate is currently stored on site pending disposal <br /> r Groundwater samples were collected from each well after physical parameters had stabilized and <br /> the water in the well had recovered to at least 80% of pre-development levels Samples were <br /> placed in an ice chest at a temperature of 4° Centigrade and submitted to Argon Laboratory under <br /> r chain of custody protocol The samples were analyzed for the presence of TPHg and TPHd by <br /> EPA method 8015K BTEX by EPA method 8020, and oxygenated gasoline additives, EDB, and <br /> 1,2-DCA by EPA method 8260 Field development/purge logs are included in Attachment B <br /> r3.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION <br /> r3.1 Subsurface Conditions <br /> Fill material was encountered in boring MW 1 to a depth of approximately 14 feet bgs Soil <br /> r encountered in the borings located outside the limits of the excavation was classified as clay, silt, and <br /> sand Soil in borings MW2 and MW4 are primarily sands below approximately 8-12 feet bgs (to <br /> approximately 24 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored), and native soil in borings MW 1 and MW3 <br /> rare primarily clays and silts Soil boring logs are included in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater was initially encountered at depths ranging from approximately 8 to 11 feet bgs <br />' during drilling The depth to groundwater on May 21, 2001 ranged from 7 70 feet bgs in well <br /> MW4 to 8 96 feet bgs in well MW 1, and flowed in a southwesterly direction with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0 003 ft/ft Groundwater elevations are summarized in Table 1 A potentiometric <br />' surface map generated using the May 21, 2001 data is depicted on Figure 4 Groundwater <br /> monitoring, field data and well development/purge logs are included in Attachment B <br /> I3.2 Soil Analytical Results <br /> No TPHd, BTEX, 1,2-DCA, or EDB were detected in any soil samples collected from borings <br />' MWl-MW4 TPHg was detected at 7 1 parts per million (ppm) in the sample collected from <br /> MW3 at 5 feet bgs and MTBE was detected at 0 016 ppm in the sample collected from MW3 at <br /> 15 feet bgs Soil analytical results are summarized in Table 2 Laboratory reports and chain of <br />' custody documentation are included in Attachment C <br /> 3.3 Groundwater Analytical Results <br />' MTBE was the only constituent of concern detected in any site well MTBE was detected in <br /> wells MW1, MW3, and MW4 at concentrations of 58 parts per billion (ppb), 320 ppb, and 96 <br /> ppb, respectively MTBE was not detected in well MW2 Groundwater analytical results are <br /> . summarized in Table 3 Laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation are included in <br />' Attachment B <br />' G Oata1GROUNDZE43arnyard-Manser\Reports\WELLRPT doe <br />