Laserfiche WebLink
Concentrations of nitrate ranged from 1,700 ug/l in well MW-5 to 69,000 ug/l in well MW-4(Table <br /> 2). Figure 4 shows the October 2011 nitrate concentrations in groundwater. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, and MtBE) were analyzed at MW-1 due to its <br /> proximity to the former UST. MtBE was also analyzed downgradient of the former UST at well <br /> MW-5. In well MW-1,TPH-d and TPH-g were reported at 260 and 140 ug/l,respectively. Benzene <br /> was reported at 1.2 ug/l. Toluene,ethyl benzene,total xylenes, and MtBE were not detected above <br /> reporting limits. MtBE was detected near the reporting limit in well MW-5 at 0.55 ug/l (Table 2, <br /> Appendix Q. <br /> The sample from well MW-3 was analyzed for b-BHC, a member of the organochlorine class of <br /> pesticides(OCPs),and was not detected above the reporting limit of 0.10 ug/l(Table 2,Appendix B). <br /> 4.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING TRENDS <br /> The shallow groundwater flowed primarily southeast beneath the site through most of 1999 (IT, <br /> 2000). During the April 2002 monitoring event(HydroGeoLogic,2002)groundwater flow direction <br /> was consistent with previous years. In the October 2002 event (HydroGeoLogic, 2003), <br /> groundwater flow direction was more southerly,but in March 2004,was interpreted to be flowing in <br /> a westerly direction (Karsyn, 2004). JDS interpreted the flow directions to be south-southwest in <br /> October 2004, and east-southeast in October 2005 and 2011. These shifts in water table flow <br /> direction are not well understood. The site's water table does not contain abundant water as shown <br /> from pump test results (IT Corp., 1999), and it exhibits a relatively flat gradient. These <br /> characteristics likely make the flow direction sensitive to any regional influences such as changes in <br /> surface drainage and infiltration patterns, or possibly tidal influences from the nearby Port of <br /> Stockton. <br /> Trends in groundwater elevation at the site are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The site has had periodic <br /> monitoring since 1989. Figure 5 depicts data from the more recent monitoring events conducted,and <br /> Figure 6 illustrates all historic data combined. Both Figures exhibit the strong seasonal variation of <br /> water levels that correspond to the wet and dry seasons indicative of the region. In the late 1980's <br /> and early 1990's, groundwater elevations ranged from-8 feet to-14 feet relative to mean sea level <br /> (feet msl), rising to nearly 0 feet msl (sea level) in the late 1990's. The large rise in shallow <br /> groundwater elevation(>10 feet)at the site between the late 1980's and late 1990's is consistent with <br /> observations made throughout the region and is likely a result of El Nino weather patterns that <br /> brought several years of above-normal precipitation. The October 2011 groundwater elevations were <br /> higher than those observed in the Fall of 2002,2004, and 2005, and consistent with those observed in <br /> the late 1990's. <br /> Nitrate <br /> Relative to October 2005,the concentration of nitrate in groundwater decreased significantly in every <br /> well tested except MW-1, which exhibited a modest increase. Based on the predominant east- <br /> southeast groundwater flow direction,and that relatively higher nitrate concentrations occur at wells <br /> MW-3 and MW-4,it is feasible that off-site nitrate continues to impact the site. Figure 7 depicts the <br /> nitrate concentrations with time in selected wells. MW-1 and MW-7 were not plotted. <br /> cdwn 4go-l1 5 JD.m h cm wmg MIM I <br />