My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010 YEAR 4 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WHISKEY SLOUGH
>
3900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506738
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010 YEAR 4 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2020 8:47:23 AM
Creation date
6/22/2020 8:32:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010 YEAR 4 PHYTOREMEDIATION TREE MONITORING REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506738
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007603
FACILITY_NAME
DEPAOLI DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
WHISKEY SLOUGH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
HOLT
Zip
95234
APN
13109022
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3900 WHISKEY SLOUGH RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br /> SECTION 4:YEAR 4 TREE MONITORING RESULTS <br /> J <br /> TABLE 4.2 J <br /> Health and Vigor bMonitoring Year <br /> Year 1 (2007) Year 2(2008) Year 3(2009) Year 4(2010) <br /> Health and Health and Health and Health and <br /> Planting Site Vigor Score Vigor Score Vigor Score Vigor Score <br /> Area A 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 <br /> Addition to Area A 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.3 <br /> Area AA 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 <br /> Area B 1.8 1.6 2.3 2.4 <br /> Area C 1.6 - 1.38 1.9 2.2 J <br /> Area D 1.5 1.4a 1.7 1.6 <br /> Average Health andJ <br /> Vigor Score(All Sites) 1.91 1.91 2.2c 2.2` <br /> NOTES: <br /> aSubsequent to annual tree monitoring,tree replanting in Areas C and D was performed in late-November 2008. <br /> Survivorship in these areas was assessed in Year 3(2009)and Year 4(2010). <br /> bDue to rounding,scores for both 2007 and 2008 are 1.9.The average health and vigor score in 2007 was 1.94; <br /> the average health and vigor score in 2008 was 1.90. <br /> Due to rounding,scores for both 2009 and 2010 are 2.2.The average health and vigor score in 2009 was 2.23; <br /> the average health and vigor score in 2010 was 2.22. <br /> Vigor Ranks: <br /> (3)-high vigor score <br /> (2)-medium vigor score <br /> (1)-low vigor score <br /> (0)-tree dead <br /> 4.1 Area A <br /> Area A supports all three planting zones (lower,middle and higher) and therefore has a <br /> high diversity of planted tree species (Figures 1-3 and 1-4).Six species of trees were planted <br /> in this area. <br /> Year 1 (2007) <br /> The mortality rate in this planting area in Year 1 (2007)was low (Table 4-1). Three box elder <br /> trees died in 2007(3 out of 42 trees) (CH2M HILL 2008). These trees were all located in the <br /> higher planting zone where depth to groundwater is greatest. On average,for all six species <br /> combined,plant survivorship in Area A was 93 percent in Year 1 (2007).The average heath <br /> and vigor score was 2.6,which corresponded to a rank in between"high" and"medium'. <br /> Year 2 (2008) J <br /> The mortality rate in this planting area remained low in Year 2 (12 percent). Four box elder <br /> trees and one black willow tree died (or 5 out of 42 trees). All of the box elders were within <br /> the higher planting zone,where conditions are driest. The black willow tree was within the <br /> lower planting zone,a more mesic part of the planting area. On average,for all species <br /> 4-2 SACJ1667491103500001(YEAR4-2010_HOLTTREE MONITORING_REPORT-RNAL.DOCX) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.